Rabbi Richman is devoting his efforts towards the Temple Mount and a possible Third Temple (“Mounting A Challenge To The Status Quo,” April 11). I would like to remind all of us what the result was of the First Temple. For seven years, King Solomon taxed the people to such an extent that it helped create the major split in our ranks and exacerbated the division with the northern tribes; his son Reheboam, continued the taxing practice which led to disaster.
The headline on the April 11 story about the East Ramapo public school district, “It’s Now Orthodox vs. Orthodox In Ramapo,” is stretching the truth. In contrast to the membership and Orthodox electorate of the school district, how many of them are affiliated with Uri L’Tzedek?
In response to the online Opinion piece by Stephanie Ives, “Why New Israel Fund Is Marching For Israel,” there is opposition to NIF participation in the Israel unity parade because some of its grantees boycott products produced beyond Israel’s 1949 armistice line. Such boycotts, unlike that of cottage cheese, and of stores open on Shabbat by the very observant, as mentioned by the author as justification, are far different. These are out of religious conviction or to lower the price of an item. Boycotts of “settlement products” perpetuated by the far left are organized and meant to cripple existing businesses based upon ideological differences.
I applaud the efforts of the Ruderman Foundation in bringing greater awareness of American Jewish life to Israeli leaders (“Schooling The Knesset,” Between The Lines, April 9). Especially valuable was the discussion of the various denominations and the limitations of a denominational system in serving Klal Yisrael. I am concerned, however, that those very limitations were reflected in the makeup of the discussants. It would have been valuable to all concerned, and particularly enlightening to the Israeli leaders in attendance, to have included representatives of post-denominational and pluralistic institutions in the gathering.
It is with great sadness that I read your article on how some of our young people are not going to seders (“Passover Seder Losing Steam As Key Marker Of Affiliation,” April 9). A seder done traditionally is a wonderful experience that can evoke discussion around the table on the very fundamental issue of freedom. It’s an issue that is as relevant today as it was thousands of years ago.
Steve Lipman’s “Passover Seder Losing Steam As Key Marker Of Affiliation” (April 9) quoted me as doubting the “drop in seder attendance is as dramatic as indicated.” Unfortunately he didn’t recount the basis for my doubts.
Here’s one example that just considers national survey data. Lipman quotes figures that suggest that in the 1990s seder attendance stood at about 90 percent and now has fallen to 70 percent, according to the 2013 Pew survey.
Ethan Bronner of The New York Times feels “exasperated” (according to Gary Rosenblatt’s April 4 article, “Seeking The Middle In The Middle East”) that he has been accused of anti-Israel bias. He then proceeds to mouth precisely the kind of biased statements that have elicited such criticism.
In his Letter (March 28), Gil Kulick proposes that, among other things, Prime Minister Netanyahu could say to the Palestinians that “Israel will immediately cease building new housing for settlers across the Green Line until an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement is concluded.” I would suggest a one-word change: Replace “until” with “when.” Otherwise the Palestinians will have no incentive to ever conclude a peace agreement.