When Work And Religion Collide
06/12/12
Staff Writer
Photo Galleria: 

Two religious accommodation cases last week that involved Orthodox Jews — a prospective Sabbath-observant employee of a New York-based consulting firm, and a chasidic Jew whose beard threatens to keep him out of the New York Police Department — are part of an ongoing tug of war between employers and religious workers, says the veteran lawyer who has advocated on behalf of Shabbat-observant Jews for more than four decades.

Nathan Lewin says employers’ opposition to employees’ religious practices is a “recurring problem” usually motivated by financial or personnel reasons, not a growing opposition to members of any faith.

New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced a settlement with Milrose Consultants, an architectural and engineering firm, which reportedly rescinded a job offer to a prospective, unnamed employee who would have to leave work early on some Fridays to get home before sundown. The settlement requires the firm to put in place a religious accommodation policy.

And the NYPD dismissed from its academy Fishel Litzman, a Lubavitcher chasid from Rockland County who refused, for religious reasons, to trim his beard. Litzman, 28, a former paramedic who had quit his job as a paramedic in order to train for a career as a police officer, was fired a few weeks before he was to join the police force. Lewin, in a telephone interview this week with The Jewish Week, said he will file an appeal to the NYPD’s action in federal court.

NYPD rules require officers to be clean-shaven, with exceptions for a beard, no longer than one millimeter, kept for religious reasons.

Lewin, who served as Litzman’s pro bono attorney, called the police department’s decision to dismiss Litzman a violation of federal religious accommodation laws, but not anti-Semitic. “The police department is not anti-Semitic. The police department,” which includes about a score of Orthodox officers, “ is not anti-Jewish.”

Litzman’s dismissal “is a violation of his religious rights,” Lewin said. “It definitely is religious discrimination.”

Lewin earlier represented Rabbi Mitchell Geller, an Air Force chaplain who won a similar case in 1976, and Rabbi Menachem Stern, who was installed as an Army chaplain last year.

Last Update:

06/12/2012 - 17:22

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.