One-Week Workshops
view counter
The Tattoo: Still Taboo?
Drew Barrymore gets hers removed, but tattoos among Jews persist, as in ancient times.
Special To The Jewish Week
Photo Galleria: 

Drew Barrymore, it has been reported in recent days, is having her tattoos removed.

The entertainment press says the actress is having laser surgery to erase several tattoos because she plans to convert to Judaism. (Her husband, Will Kopelman, is Jewish).

The reports noted that Barrymore would not be allowed burial in a Jewish cemetery unless she had the tattoos removed.
What is the source of prohibitions of tattoos for Jews, and are they relevant today?

The Talmud (Sanhedrin 103b) records a bizarre dispute about a tattoo that King Jehoiakim of Judah had on his male organ. Interpreting the “abominations … found upon him” (II Chron. 36:8) as a tattoo, one rabbi averred that it consisted of the name of a pagan deity, while another rabbi disagreed, stating that in fact it was the name of God that had been inked there.

Another Talmudic passage (Makkot 21a) indicates that the dispute about Jeoiakim’s tattoo may hinge upon the interpretation of Leviticus 19:38 (“You shall not … make any tattoo marks on yourselves: I am the Lord”). According to the first rabbi (echoed many centuries later by Maimonides), the Jewish aversion to tattoos is part of its age-old polemic against idolatry, contravening God’s declaration that “I am the Lord,” especially when paying explicit homage to a foreign god. In the view of the second sage, however, the biblical ban on tattoos is non-rational, rooted in divine fiat. As such, the most egregious type of tattoo, the most audacious rebellion against Jewish tradition, is specifically one that contains God’s name.

In some respects, this dispute continues even today: one’s attitude toward the increased incidence of Jews with tattoos, including ones with Jewish themes, may depend on whether one views tattoos as problematic due to their association with non-Jewish culture or due to a long-standing but ultimately non-rational cultural taboo.

A recent and much-discussed New York Times article profiled a mainly Israeli phenomenon of grandchildren getting tattoos to match those that their grandparents were forced to get at Auschwitz. No doubt, this trend is partially rooted in a desire to commemorate and personalize the Holocaust. Yet it seems that it also represents an attempt to adopt tattoos as a time-honored Jewish practice. After all, how can a tattoo be untraditional if it is identical to the one that one’s European zeyde has on his forearm? In fact, according to research conducted by Rabbi Rochelle Tulik, about two-fifths of Jews’ tattoos can be identified as Jewish in some way.

Tattoos have become quite popular and acceptable in both the American and Israeli Jewish communities as attitudes changed in the broader culture: according to a 2007 Pew study, almost 40 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 and 40 have tattoos, but only 10 percent of those between 41 and 64. Yet until quite recently, tattoos were considered taboo within the American Jewish community, even as numerous other biblical prohibitions were observed mainly in the breach. Personal experience (a cousin whose family was willing to accept her gentile fiancée but mortified when they learned of his tattoo) and popular culture (two sitcoms whose main characters are intermarried Jews — “The Nanny” and “Curb Your Enthusiasm” — devoted episodes to Jewish anxieties about tattoos) indicate that the tattoo taboo persisted even as many others eroded significantly.

The trend toward Jewish-themed tattoos, coupled with the persistence of the myth that Jews with tattoos cannot be buried in a Jewish cemetery, imply that American-Jewish attitudes toward tattoos were fueled, at least in part, by the belief that tattoos are — or, until very recently, were — quintessentially foreign to Jewish culture.

The myth about the cemetery (perhaps finally debunked by reports that Amy Winehouse was given a traditional Jewish funeral) is particularly instructive in this regard. Whether he invented it or merely popularized it, the earliest record in pop culture of this erroneous belief is a comedy routine by Lenny Bruce. As partially recounted in his 1965 autobiography, “How to Talk Dirty and Influence People,” the comic returned from the navy with a tattoo on his arm, whereupon a traditionally minded aunt informs him that he can never be buried in a Jewish cemetery. Bruce’s solution? Let them cut off the tattooed arm and bury it in a Catholic cemetery. Applying Bruce’s own famous “Jewish/goyish” dichotomy, it makes perfect sense why a goyish tattoo, obtained while serving in the goyish navy, would relegate someone to the goyish cemetery. Bruce’s grotesque solution externalizes his sense of belonging neither wholly in the Jewish nor wholly in the goyish cemetery.

Lenny Bruce thus agrees with Maimonides and the first Talmudic opinion that tattoos are problematic in that they are foreign to Jewish culture. In this reading, a Jewish-themed tattoo indeed mitigates the problem.

On the other hand, it is possible that the prohibition on tattoos outlasted most others because, unlike transgressions related to sex, food and money, it is not subject to accident or appetite? This was dramatized in the Israeli show “Srugim”: a newly ex-religious character’s tattoo demonstrates that for her, unlike her boyfriend who abandoned observance for sex and seafood, the decision to leave tradition was part of her identity, and she is willing to literally and figuratively stigmatize herself for its sake. This reading tracks closely with the non-rationalist Talmudic opinion, as it would seem to make little difference whether the tattoo is Jewish-themed or not.

Thus, the contemporary debate about Auschwitz-style, Jewish-themed, and other types of tattoos shares similarities with a rabbinic debate from some 1,500 years ago. If the Talmud is any indication, this debate will continue to go on for a very long time.

Elli Fischer is a writer and Hebrew-English translator in Israel.

Last Update:

11/28/2016 - 09:40
Auschwitz, Drew Barrymore, taboo, tattoo
The Jewish Week App -- Now Available!
view counter


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Tattoos are a symbol of many culture representing, respect and experiences for example tribal tattoos, I have been reading their origins and meanings since and are awesome

In the beginning of this article it says about Drew Barrymore, "The reports noted that Barrymore would not be allowed burial in a Jewish cemetery unless she had the tattoos removed." This is totally false. There is no halacha (Jewish Law) that states that a Jew can’t be buried in a Jewish cemetery due to having tattoos. This is an old myth. Sadly, I have several friends that died in a car accident a few years ago. All of them had tatoos and all of them were buried in a Jewish Orthodox Cemetery. They were not religious, but their parents are. There was never any debate about if they could be buried in the Jewish cemetery because of their tattoos.

This blurb about tattoos demonstrates how there is a huge generational divide as well as how misguided traditions start out in the first place. Believe it or not, traditions although "felt" to have a life anchoring effect, are actually cultural markers of identity. Tattoos in particular were invented coincidentally for the very same reason. To Identify a 'Group". It is my personal hope that we will advance to a future where grouping and exclusivity will dissolve into harmony among us all. Go hang out at a middle school some time and check out what kind of harm (selective blindness, false pride, bullying, pecking orders, false safety) these clicks cause to our children. If you wanna make a tribe....then make a tribe and God bless those who can pull this feat off today. Our structure/humanity/laws make this sort of harmonious grouping extremely that adaption must be made which makes arguing over tattoos and what was accepted 500 years ago just plain silly.

Cool article. Start with a talmudic dispute; make a chakira to analyze it; use the chakira to explicate modern questions: classic Gush. Well done, sir.

the notion of tattoos prohibiting a person from being buried in a Jewish cemetery is misguided and incorrect. as R. Solomon Freehof points out, if any *one* "transgression" disallowed a Jew from being buried in a Jewish cemetery, our cemeteries would be empty....

Indeed. Note the part where the author refers to this belief as a "myth".

"the biblical ban on tattoos is non-rational, rooted in divine fiat"
In the ancient Mediterranean world tattoos were only found on slaves and criminals. The halachic ban on them was rooted in that observation. It is completely rational to not want to be marked as a slave or a criminal.

Stigma literally means tattoo in Greek.

That''s Leviticus 19:28 not :38.

The Biblical citation is incorrect. It should read "Leviticus 19.28"
Thank you.

"Tattoo" is derived from the Tahitian word tattau, which means "to mark" ( Contrary to popular belief, these "markings" have been around for for hundreds of years, and more than likely began as a way to physically display the honor, value, and worth of a particular person. RABBI DR. BERNHARD ROSENBERG

view counter