Tony Judt, Zionist Who Became Israel Critic, Dies At 62

NYU scholar, who accused the ADL of stifling him in 2006 clash, suffered from ALS.

08/10/10
Staff Writer
Photo Galleria: 

Tony Judt, the British social historian who was an avid Zionist as a teenager and an outspoken critic of Israel as an adult, died Aug. 6 in his Manhattan home of ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease. He was 62.

Dr. Judt, the Erich Maria Remarque professor in European studies at New York University, helped promote the migration of British Jews to Israel in 1966 and worked as a volunteer in Israel before and after the Six-Day War the following year, but said his belief in a Jewish state – he called it “an anachronism” – began to diminish in the aftermath of the war when Israel took control of the Arab territories it had conquered.

“I went with this idealistic fantasy of creating a socialist, communitarian country through work,” he said, calling this view “remarkably unconscious of the people” – Palestinian Arabs – “who had been kicked out of the country and were suffering in refugee camps.”

A frequent contributor to The New York Review of Books, he used his essays as a forum for attacking policies of the Israeli government. Israel, he wrote in 2003, was turning into a “belligerently intolerant, faith-driven ethno state.” He called for the conversion of Israel “from a Jewish state to a binational one.” In a 2006 op-ed piece for The New York Times, he predicted that “it will not be self-evident to future generations of American Jews” of why the interests the United States “are so closely aligned with one small, controversial Mediterranean client state.”

In late 2006, Dr. Judt and his supporters accused the Anti-Defamation League of trying to silence his criticism of Israel by pressuring the Polish Consulate to cancel a discussion there about the pro-Israel lobby in the U.S., a charge the ADL vehemently denied in a controversy that lasted weeks.

More recently, Dr. Judt earlier this year declared that the Israeli Navy’s fatal interception of the Gaza-bound Mavi Marmara ship as part of a relief flotilla would seriously jeopardize U.S.-Turkish relations.

“I think intellectuals have a primary duty to dissent not from the conventional wisdom of the age (though that too) but, and above all, from the community of their own community,” Dr. Judt said in an interview earlier this year.

A Jerusalem Post editorial this week attacked Dr. Judt’s comments on Turkish-Israel relations. “As if the gradual process of Islamic extremism that has gripped Turkey since the rise to power of the AKP [political party] had nothing to do with that country’s changing orientation,” the paper wrote.

Dr. Judt’s frequent criticism of Israel placed him among “other contemporary Jewish intellectuals of the Diaspora … who have chosen to single out Israel for opprobrium that is rarely, if ever, directed at other countries that chose to adopt unique religious or cultural-based nationalities,” an editorial in The Jerusalem Post this week stated. “At the center of Judt’s attacks on Israel was a stubborn refusal to accept the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in a distinctly Jewish state. For Judt, European particularism as an undeniable fact, but the Jewish variety was outdated.”

The Jerusalem Post called Dr. Judt’s 2003 essay in The New York Review of Books, which called for Israel’s replacement with “a single, integrated, bi-national state” between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea “a recipe for national suicide for the sovereign Jewish entity.”

“Today I’m regarded outside New York University as a looney-tunes leftie self-hating Jewish communist,” he told The Guardian of London this this year. “Inside the university I’m regarded as typical old-fashioned white male liberal elitist. I like that. I’m on the edge of both, it makes me feel comfortable.”

Diagnosed two years ago with ALS, a debilitating motor neuron disease, he became paralyzed from his neck down within months, breathing with the aid of a respirator.

 

 

Last Update:

08/18/2010 - 08:08

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

One may be critical of Israel or any other legitimate state, Israel being a liberal democratic one and a UN member state. But when one uses his criticism, as Tony Judt did - regardless of his/her personal psychological and/or social reasons - into singling out a people, the Jewish people in this case, and denying this people and only this people its universally accepted right afforded all other peoples, the right of national self-determination and independence, the "criticisms" amount to a form of racism, anti-Jewish racism in this case. Sadly, Tony Judt was a sharp minded person gone astray. He came from our ranks, Jews, turned against us as a people and against our national home. He has not been the first in Jewish history... and is not likely to be the last... yet, עם ישראל חי 'am israel hai (the People of Israel Lives-On!!!).
Its difficult to believe Anonymous (above) would post a comment calling Judt a far left agitator. Don't forget his writings, read him in the New York Review of Books and form your own opinion. Yidn shreibt und farshreit!
While I regret the death of any person, especially from such a horrible disease, Judt was merely another far left, anti-Israel agitator who mislead liberal Americans including many Jews. His views were without basis in reality, biased and inimicable to peace and the survival of Israel. The sooner his utterings are forgotten, the better.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.