Schechter Rebranding Effort Takes On Hurdles

Conservative day school network hoping new name, ‘compass’ logo spark turnaround.

05/18/11
Associate Editor
Photo Galleria: 

It’s been a long time since the Conservative movement’s Solomon Schechter day schools — challenged by shrinking enrollment, competition from newer community day schools and Hebrew charter schools, and a denomination in demographic decline — have had an opportunity to celebrate.

But last Wednesday at the Jewish Theological Seminary, a light at the end of the tunnel came into view. Or more accurately, a bright red “rose compass” — a six-pointed red-and-pink logo meant to evoke both a Star of David and a compass — which was unveiled, along with a new name and marketing strategy.

The Solomon Schechter Day School Association, an umbrella for 49 schools, is becoming The Schechter Day School Network, with the tagline: “Engage The World.” And while “Solomon” has been dropped from the materials, the schools’ namesake — the Romania-born scholar-rabbi who discovered the Cairo Geniza, served as president of JTS and founded what is now the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism — will get new attention.

While he has never had the household-name status enjoyed by other JTS icons like Rabbis Abraham Joshua Heschel and Mordechai Kaplan, Schechter is now being introduced as the embodiment of the kind of “intellectual explorer” and “global Jewish citizen” that the Conservative schools say they seek to produce.

The new branding/marketing strategy is the culmination of a $240,000 ($171,000 from UJA-Federation of New York) collaborative project involving a paid branding firm (BBMG), consortium of 11 Schechter schools in the tri-state area, the various arms of the Conservative movement and the Jewish Education Project (which itself recently re-branded, changing its name from BJENY-SAJES and acquiring a fresh logo).

Jewish Education Project officials suggested the consortium focus on rebranding and marketing, in response to findings, in a 2008 UJA-Federation study called “To Go Or Not To Go,” that many liberal Jews in Manhattan and Long Island were unaware of the differences between non-Orthodox day schools and Orthodox ones, perceiving both as “insular” and weak in secular subjects.

Why, when Schechter schools make up but one small segment of metro New York’s day schools (but the majority of its non-Orthodox ones), have the federation and Jewish Education Project devoted so much attention to the movement?

Because, said Bill Robinson, chief strategy officer of the Project, the New York-area Schechters had already banded together as a consortium and approached UJA-Federation and his group for assistance.

“This is not about competing with other day schools,” Robinson emphasized. “It’s about increasing the market and stopping the drop-off of non-Orthodox enrollment” in day schools.

While initially envisioned primarily for the tri-state schools, Elaine Cohen — executive of the national Schechter School Network (formerly the Solomon Schechter Day School Association) — announced last week that the new name and logo will be adopted nationally, and she invited Schechter schools throughout North America to participate in the new marketing strategy.

At the JTS launch last week, which featured speeches from JTS Chancellor Arnold Eisen and United Synagogue Executive Vice President Rabbi Steven Wernick, among others, the mood was upbeat, almost a pep rally for Conservative Judaism and its day schools.

Noting the critical role day schools play in preparing future generations of liberal Jewish leaders (a recent Avi Chai Foundation study shows day school alumni, many of them presumably Schechter alumni, are disproportionately represented among non-Orthodox leadership), Eisen said that “only summer camp compares” to them in terms of impact.

“And Schechter has the advantage of being year-round and being school, which is real life for kids,” he added.Schechter schools, said Uri Cohen, director of development for Solomon Schechter School of Manhattan, give children a “moral compass” and the “ability to navigate complex moral and intellectual challenges.”

“We. Are. Schechter,” Elaine Suchow, development director of Solomon Schechter School of Queens, and the founder of the tri-state consortium, pronounced triumphantly after leading the audience of 90, a mix of representatives from the tri-state Schechter schools and others involved in the project, in the Hebrew song, “Hineh Mah Tov” (How Good It Is).

Founded in 1956, Suchow’s school is one of the oldest Conservative day schools, and the very first to adopt the Schechter name. Suchow played a lead role in encouraging the local schools to collaborate with each other and recruiting support from the other players.

But is marketing and branding enough to reverse the Schechter schools’ decline? At their peak, less than 15 years ago, there were 63 Schechter schools, enrolling more than 21,000 children in North America. Today, 49 schools enroll less than 14,000.

As recently as last year, while enrollment increased at Modern Orthodox schools and stabilized at community schools, it dropped almost 5 percent in Schechter schools, according to a census conducted by Marvin Schick, a consultant for the Avi Chai Foundation. (This coming year may be better however. “This is the first year in three or four years where I have received e-mails from Schechter school heads informing me that they are expecting an increase in enrollments next year, so perhaps we are already turning a corner,” Elaine Cohen told The Jewish Week.)

While many of the remaining Schechters — such as one in Westchester County and another in New Milford, N.J., — are considered to be thriving, “at least a third are endangered,” Schick told The Jewish Week.

Some Schechters, such as ones in suburban Detroit, Morris County, N.J. and Providence, have recently gone from Conservative to nondenominational, joining the RAVSAK Community Day School Network. (See Sidebar)

With even many highly engaged American Jews shying away from denominational labels and growing numbers of interfaith families whose children aren’t Jewish according to the traditional halachic definitions to which the Conservative movement adheres, it is not clear whether Schechter schools, which pride themselves on their rigorous Judaic studies, serve a large enough niche to be viable.

“They’re affected even more than others by what’s happening in American Jewish life,” said Schick. Schechter schools on average devote more hours to Judaic studies than community schools do, Schick said, and that might be a problem: the Conservative schools are “more religious than most non-Orthodox American Jews want to be.”

Then there’s the price tag. In the New York area, Schechter tuition ranges from $9,200 for the lower grades at the Brandeis School (in the Five Towns) to $32,000 for the higher grades (middle school) at Solomon Schechter School of Manhattan. While their tuition is comparable to community/pluralistic schools and often lower than secular private schools, Schechters tend to be pricier than Orthodox schools. Amidst a lingering recession in which even many Modern Orthodox families are leaving day schools to economize, and with some parents seeing tuition-free Hebrew charter schools as an alternative, can Schechter schools actually attract new families?

Schechter proponents say they can — and that their schools fill a critical, centrist niche.

“The main goal of this branding and marketing initiative is to reach Jewish families with school-age children who at this point in time are saying, ‘Day school? That’s not for me,’” Elaine Cohen told The Jewish Week. “We’re saying ‘Yes, you belong here. Our schools are good for your kids.’ We’re not trying to recruit only from Conservative families. The pool of prospective families is larger.”

Schechter schools are open to Modern Orthodox, Reform and secular families as well — and the differences between them and community schools are not always especially noticeable.

“Many Schechter schools have quite a wide range of families from various denominations, and they’re all respected,” said Rabbi Jim Rogozen, who is president of the Schechter Network and headmaster of Gross Schechter Day School in Cleveland. “But the approach of what we teach and how we teach it is based on Conservative Judaism.”

Steven Lorch, head of Solomon Schechter School of Manhattan, said that while his school takes “a stand on normative practice,” it is, “in the way we think of who the community is, very pluralistic.”

According to Lorch, the Schechter approach can be more effective than the community/pluralistic approach in the elementary years when children are in the “industry” stage of psychosocial development: “learning how to be a competent person in the terms defined by adults around them.”

“If the message is this way, that way or not at all if you don’t want to, that works against the developmental stage of industry and leaves the challenge of the stage unresolved,” Lorch said.

While the Schechter network still adheres to the “matrilineal descent” definition of who is a Jew — one factor in some schools’ decision to switch affiliation — it has become more welcoming of interfaith families in the past decade. Schools have become less concerned about the mother’s Jewish status as long as the child is raised exclusively Jewish and has a halachic conversion before bar or bat mitzvah.

While no one expects branding and marketing to solve every problem, particularly not the financial challenges inherent in operating day schools, many argue that, by dispelling misconceptions about the schools, they can attract parents who might not otherwise have considered a Jewish school — including many who do consider secular private schools and can thus afford a day school.

“There’s a whole world of people who don’t know about us, or what they think about us is incorrect,” said Suchow.

The new marketing/branding approach emphasizes the schools’ embrace of science and literature, as well as their goal of preparing graduates to have a foot firmly planted in both Jewish and secular pursuits. The Jewish Education Project’s Robinson said, “Obviously these are seriously Jewish schools, but in terms of marketing it’s about engaging families who value Judaism but also something else. How do we take the Jewish tradition of learning to prepare one to become a Jewish global citizen?”

Helping the Schechter schools rebrand, he said, is “just one piece” of his agency’s efforts to increase the number of non-Orthodox children enrolling in day schools.

That strategy also includes “building a pipeline” with non-Orthodox Jewish early childhood programs — that is, having preschools do more to promote day schools and other Jewish educational options to parents — and helping day schools “continue to enhance and improve what they are doing.”

But what of people who argue that day school will never be the dominant choice for liberal American Jews and that it makes more sense to focus on camps and congregational schools (areas in which the Jewish Education Project is also involved)?

“There are limits to how far [day school enrollment] can increase,” Robinson acknowledged. “We’re never going to see the commitment to day school that we’ve seen among the Orthodox in the last 50 to 60 years. But there’s still significant room for growth.”

“We’re not shooting for everyone going to day school,” he said. “Just to move the needle.”

E-mail: julie.inthemix@gmail.com

Last Update:

06/07/2011 - 11:37

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Changing the "brand name" is not going to attract the parents to enroll their child in these schools, especially, with the charter school movement growing. The Schechter schools need lots of money for subsidizing the children's education; it needs a great deal of money to advocate Conservative day school education, especially, on the secondary school level when our young people are asking questions about God and Judaism; and unless the teachers are paid a decent salary with benefits, to attract "the best and the brightest" men and women who see teaching at Schechter not only as a respectable profession but also as their "calling," then, I'm afraid the the Schechter schools (or whatever they are called) will continue to decline.

It is hard to see how these schools can grow if the underlying religious commitments of the average conservative family remain all but indistinguishable from that of the reform movement, or entirely secular jews. This is why orthodox judaism is able to gain ground, since it members enthusiastically embrace jewish law and tradition. Hard to see how the conservative movement shifts gears. But wishing and hoping for the best.

Anybody who has gone through a comprehensive marketing discovery and exploration process can attest to the fact that the logo is only a tiny fraction of the beneficial deliverables. The educators, leaders, volunteers who sat together long hours around the table have learned as a team how to better articulate what we have known all along; a Schechter education is a treasure and unequivocally worth it. As the details of the study become more visible and the marketing plan unfolds, the public at large will understand more about what a Schechter education can offer their families and consider the opportunity to enroll their children. This is just the beginning of what we hope will be an upward trend. We are thankful for all our devoted partners and the work of BBMG in helping us move forward with positive energy.

"We’re never going to see the commitment to day school that we’ve seen among the Orthodox in the last 50 to 60 years."

Way to set the bar high... How defeatist and unvisionary.

so what?

is that supposed to be news?
so there is a new logo (cost:250 000$) and a new branding.

This is not worth the paper it's written on (or the webspace)

Call us when we actually see an increase in ENROLLMENT or an increase in MEMBERSHIP.
Everything else is just a sad joke.

As the Coordinator of the Half-Jewish Network, I had mixed feelings reading this article. I am pleased to hear that the Schechter Schools are now admitting patrilineal children of intermarriage.

For many decades, Conservative Judaism movement institutions refused to accept these families unless the children were converted. So it is good to see that the Schechter Schools are accepting patrilineal children of intermarriage.

I would encourage the Schechter Schools to go a bit further and simply accept patrilineal children who are being raised as Jews. It would be a very healing thing to do. I will explain.

Requiring the patrilineal children to have halachic (Conservative or Orthodox, I assume) conversions before bar or bat mitzvah age sets them apart from the matrilineal children of intermarriage in ways that cannot be viewed as fair or just by the children themselves.

When I am corresponding with or speaking with half-Jewish people, I am never able to tell which ones had a Jewish father and which ones had a Jewish mother unless they have a Jewish last name from birth or tell me about their parentage. They report similar childhood experiences and similar feelings. Both groups report rejections and snubbing from some sectors of the Jewish community.

The Jewish community's distinction between children of Jewish fathers and children of Jewish mothers is artificial and damaging to any Jewish identity in both groups. Children can see quite clearly -- as do young adults -- that there are no real differences between the children of Jewish fathers and the children of Jewish mothers.

Plus many patrilineals tell me that they are taught to think of themselves as "Jewish, but with the wrong half" and are embittered by poor treatment within the Jewish community. Many matrilineals feel that their acceptance by the Jewish community is more talk than reality -- their non-Jewish dads or grandfathers are held against them in subtle ways, unless they conceal that part of their parentage.

So I would encourage the Schechter Schools to consider offering a bit more acceptance to patrilineals. They have nothing to lose and much to gain.

Cordially,
Robin Margolis
www.half-jewish.net

 Robin, I did not include this in the article, but Elaine Cohen told me when I interviewed her that Schechter schools accept Reform (and I assume Reconstructionist) conversions as well, as long as they include mikveh immersion and (for boys) hatafat dam. best, Julie

Dear Julie: I am pleased that the Schechter Schools will accept patrilineal children with Reform and Reconstructionist conversions. But my personal point was that they shouldn't be asking for these conversions at all.

If they don't ask matrilineal children to convert, they shouldn't ask patrilineal children to convert. It sends a terrible message to all of the half-Jewish children, who can clearly see that there are no real differences between the children with intermarried Jewish fathers and the children with intermarried Jewish mothers.

Moreover the patrilineal children from Reform and Reconstrutionist families who are being brought up as Jews are not required by Reform and Reconstruction to be converted -- so these patrilineal children are being asked to convert for the sake of the Schechter Schools' ties to the Conservative movement.

I think if the Schechter Schools are going to accept half-Jewish children from outside the Conservative and Orthodox movements, then they should accept these children as Jews if their home denominations -- Reform, Reconstrutionist, Humanistic, Renewal -- consider them to be Jewish.

I believe that the Schechter Schools are within their rights asking that all children entering their schools be raised exclusively Jewish -- these are religious schools in the business of promoting one particular religion.

Cordially,
Robin

Fools ! They actually paid $250,000 for a Red Jewish Star Trademark ? Oy vey. Red ? Couldn't the Federation Marketing Department Director met with JTS and came up with a symbol for the price of a bagel breakfast or two? Even better, couldn't the kids in the Schechter School system have come up with a contest to generate excitement and pride ? This is just more of the same form over substance in JTS. Things will never change. Let the school system stand for a quality education and they will be successful. Where do the graduating classes go to College? Also, earth to JTS: No orthodox are coming to Schecter. That says it all...

spot on

 Actually, it is my understanding that a number of Modern Orthodox students do attend Schechter schools. 
 My latter comment was directed at Ugg, not Robin.

As a mother of three who attended the Schechter school on Woodmere, LI
many, many years ago, and sees my grandson's name as The Development
Director of NY Schechter, I am proud to say that the education my children
received have served them well over the years and passed it down to the
next generation.

Good luck in your endeavors.

Do the schools count girls or boys of “matrilineal descent” for minyonim?

doesn't everybody count jews of matrilineal descent in a minyan?

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.