Germany Simply Inspiring
view counter
Liberal Orthodox Rabbinic Group: No Women Members
Setback for Rabba Hurwitz from fellowship Avi Weiss helped found.
Editor and Publisher
Photo Galleria: 

The most liberal Orthodox rabbinic group in the U.S. has voted down its first proposal to accept women members.

The International Rabbinic Fellowship, a group of about 140 rabbis formed three years ago by local rabbis Avi Weiss and Marc Angel, held a “wonderfully healthy and passionate discussion” of the issue before “a close vote” Dec. 20, according to Rabbi Barry Gelman of Houston, the president of the organization.

He would not divulge the specific vote count as the rabbis voted down proposals to allow women full or limited membership.

Though not surprising, the outcome was seen as a blow to advocates of increased recognition of women in synagogue roles, especially since Rabbi Weiss, as a founder of the IRF, has been a leader in calling for such efforts.

The IRF was founded, in part, to serve as a home to rabbis not accepted as members of the Rabbinical Council of America, the largest Orthodox rabbinic group. Rabbis whose ordination is from Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, the rabbinical school Rabbi Weiss founded, have not been allowed membership in the RCA.

The most likely female candidate for IRF membership, Rabba Sara Hurwitz, who functions in a rabbinic role at the Hebrew Institute of Riverdale, where Rabbi Weiss is senior rabbi, acknowledged disappointment with the vote. But she said she is focusing on other issues, like her work at Yeshivat Maharat, the small yeshiva for women she heads, and seeking to network with other women involved in synagogue leadership.

She noted that some IRF members advocated for women’s membership and said she is “looking for a time when men and women can be equal partners, especially in the area of spiritual leadership.”

Rabbi Weiss said he had hoped that women would be admitted.

“Although this was not the outcome, I found the discussions respectful, productive and uplifting,” he said. “Every voice in the conversation supported maximizing the role of women in spiritual leadership in the Orthodox community, both within the synagogue and without.”

The discussion, he said, focused on “what is the right way for the IRF as an organization to practically go forward at this juncture in time.”

Fellow IRF co-founder Rabbi Marc Angel said he believes that had the vote been framed as simply seeking to admit Rabba Hurwitz, it would have passed.

But since it was a general proposal to accept women members, he said, and since there are no Orthodox women rabbis who qualify for membership, the proposal was defeated.

“I think she does fit the bill,” Rabbi Angel added, referring to Rabba Hurwitz. “She has the equivalent training, but that wasn’t the question asked.”

He said he thinks women will be admitted to the IRF at some point.

Describing the debate leading up to the vote, Rabbi Gelman, the group’s president, said that advocates for women’s membership argued that since the IRF already was in favor of women serving in synagogues and other areas of Jewish life, membership was a natural next step.

Some felt that it was unethical and immoral not to do so, the rabbi said.

Opponents maintained that the IRF was not an ordaining organization and therefore not the appropriate one to decide whether or not to admit women.

The majority of the rabbis rejected the argument that this was an issue of ethics or morality, he said.

Another factor in the vote was concern about maintaining the IRF’s credentials in the Orthodox community.

“Some argued that it is important for our group to have a voice in the Orthodox rabbinic world, to be relevant and be heard,” Rabbi Gelman noted. “Our group is in its infancy and this is not the right time” to accept women members.

He added that some member rabbis were concerned about getting too far ahead of their synagogue constituents.

Rabbi Gelman said he personally opposed admitting women, in part because “this is not the road for the IRF to go down at this time. We want to gain some traction and deal with nuts and bolts issues and be seen as an educational leader.”

He cited such issues that are “at the heart and soul” of Jewish life as “Talmud Torah, stale tefillah [prayer] in some shuls, spirituality, and the day school economic crunch.”

Rabbi Gelman emphasized that the IRF “has publicly stated that we are in favor of women serving in various forms of congregational and communal religious and spiritual leadership in accordance with the halacha and Orthodox practice.”

Robin Bodner, executive director of JOFA, the Orthodox feminist organization, said her group “applauds the IRF for making some bold statements, including that women can paskin [make halachic decisions], while at the same time we hope to soon see the day when women are included in the IRF as full-time members.”

Steven Bayme, national director of the American Jewish Committee’s contemporary Jewish life department, said he was not surprised by the vote, observing that the IRF was seeking “to maintain its bona fides” in the Orthodox community.

He said the group serves an important role in that community in that it is “poised to articulate alternative positions” and has “moved toward greater women’s participation.”

The bind for Orthodoxy, according to Bayme, is that it is enjoying “a demographic resurgence by moving to the right.” He said the IRF, with its more lenient views than the RCA on significant issues, like conversion, has “the opportunity to take a leadership position that embraces the wider world.”


Last Update:

01/28/2011 - 11:52
Avi Weiss, Barry Gelman, International Rabbinic Fellowship, Marc Angel, Orthodox Judaism, Sara Hurwitz
The Jewish Week App -- Now Available!
view counter


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

My late father used to say that every Jew thinks that everyone to his right is a religious fanatic and that everyone to his left is "as good as a goy," and that it does not matter where on the spectrum that individual is. I'm afraid that the IRC is showing these tendencies by fearing losing their standing in the Orthodox community. Until we drop brand labels and see that all seriously committed Jews are on the same side and that everyone else is in Rosenzweig's "not yet" category, we will continue to have these problems. Over my lifetime, I have been a member of Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, Reconstructionist and nondenominational groups, often simultaneously. When people ask me, I say that I am a serious Jew and refuse to get drawn into denominational definitions. The common thread is that all my congregations and groups consist of people who are actively searching for a connection to the Jewish people, past, present and future.
Apparently they are too threatened to let women rise to the level of intellect and competence of which they are capable. Pretty pathetic, and it's decisions like this that keep women like me from becoming more active in the religion. I have too much self respect to let men regard me as unacceptable.
It is shocking that the IRF is considered a mainstream Orthodox Rabbinical organization. It is not and was never intended to be one. However, it appears that the Board of Directors is wrestling with the explicit impact a decision to publicly leave Orthodoxy will have upon its membership community. It fears that many will not continue membership. The Board of Directors must decide if they are committed to preservation of Orthodox Judaism or evolve into a reconstructed Neo-Orthodox Community. The decision will take tremendous courage and will not be universally accepted by all. Perhaps the leadership of the IRF should merge with the Jewish Theological Seminary? A merger will invigorate the Conservative Jewish Movement. It will allow many Neo-Orthodox Jews to evolve and assimilate, the main goal of the IRF Rabbinical leadership. I am certain that Rabbi Weiss and Angel will support this move.
I am fairly disgusted that the IRF leadership failed to show the moral and ethical backbone to do what we all know is right: 1. Allow Rabba Sara Hurwitz and other women with her scholarly background to enjoy the title 'rabbi', and 2. Embrace these women as members in full. I am an Orthodox 'black hat' Litvak, yet I support these women in full; how can you fail them, my more liberal colleagues?
Typical. They'll never change. "Another factor in the vote was concern about maintaining the IRF’s credentials in the Orthodox community" This really is what it's about. No backbone.

view counter