view counter
Bibi’s Missed Opportunity: An Op-Ed In The Times
Special to The Jewish Week
Photo Galleria: 

Bibi Netanyahu proved last week beyond a doubt that he was an American Jew. How so? He boycotted the New York Times!

Some American Jews angry with the Times’ coverage of Israel have employed the boycott strategy for years. When they haven’t liked the slant of news and editorial coverage, they’ve cancelled their subscriptions to the Times. Rabbis have taken to the pulpit to urge their congregations to stop buying the paper (even as they preached sermons from its pages) and others have organized anti-Times campaigns on Facebook and petitions on the Internet.

Netanyahu’s boycott was a twist on the old strategy. He didn’t say he would stop reading the paper -- just stop writing for it. In recent weeks, the Times solicited an Op-Ed piece from Netanyahu, but a senior aide “respectfully declined,” saying that the Times Op-Ed page had hosted too much anti-Israel rhetoric of late. In a scathing letter first published in the Jerusalem Post, the aide, Ron Dermer, calculated that in September through November, the Times had published 20 Op- Eds about Israel and that 19 of them were “negative.”

Dermer added: "Yet instead of trying to balance these views with a different opinion, it would seem as if the surest way to get an Op-Ed published in The New York Times these days, no matter how obscure the writer or the viewpoint, is to attack Israel," he said.

Dermer is an American Jew who made aliyah and became one of Netanyahu’s closest advisors. I found the logic of his letter quite tortured. He certainly has a right to complain about negative Israel stories – Israel has taken a lashing on the Op-Ed page of late – but the best way to counter these negative pieces is not to boycott but to engage. The Times gave Netanyahu an opportunity to refute Israel’s critics on the very page they used to criticize him. Why would he decline such an offer?

Negative news coverage of Israel in the United States is nothing new. Netanyahu rose to prominence in the 1980’s as a powerful and articulate public spokesman for Zionism as Israel’s permanent representative to the United Nations. He was a regular presence on the evening news broadcasts and later on cable TV news shows. On numerous occasions he used the Times Op-Ed page to rise to Israel’s defense. A quick search of the Times’ website revealed that Netanyahu wrote 10 Op-Eds since he took the U.N. job in 1984. His most recent one was in 2004 when he was Israel’s finance minister. The headline was “Why Israel Needs a Fence.”

Netanyahu wrote Op-Ed articles even as several prominent American rabbis urged their congregants to cancel their New York Times subscriptions. One such boycott effort came in 2002 in reaction to the Times’ coverage of the Israeli military operation into the West Bank that followed a suicide bombing at a Passover seder in Netanya.

In urging the boycott, rabbis complained that the Times – in its news and editorial comments – minimized Israel’s efforts towards peace, distorted the history of the conflict, created a false equivalence between the sides and gave disproportionate attention to Palestinian suffering.

The complaints in the Dermer letter were similar, although he focused exclusively on the editorial pages of the paper. He said that the opinion editors failed to do even the “most rudimentary fact-checking” on articles about Israel, had failed to give Israel credit for its positive record on social issues and employed columnists who “consistently distort the positions of our government and ignore the steps it has taken to advance peace.

“With all due respect to your prestigious newspaper,” Dermer concluded, “you will forgive us for declining your offer” to contribute to the Op Ed page.

Andrew Rosenthal, the editorial page editor of the Times, confirmed that he had received the Dermer letter but declined to comment on the charge that the Op Ed page was slanted against Israel. He added:

“I can tell you that I sent Netanyahu an e-mail saying that I was sorry to hear he was choosing not to write for our Op-Ed page and that if he changed his mind, he should get in touch. Got an e-mail from Dermer saying he would pass that message along.”

I sure hope Netanyahu reconsiders the offer. The best way to counter lies and distortions is with truth. In recent months, Netanyahu has taken Israel’s case to a joint session of the United States Congress (a friendly environment) and to the General Assembly of the United Nations (a hostile environment). At best, the New York Times falls somewhere in the middle. Why not take your case to the pages of America’s most influential newspaper?

Ari L. Goldman, a former New York Times reporter, is a professor at the Columbia University School of Journalism. 

Last Update:

01/03/2012 - 07:01
Benjamin Netanyahu, New York Times
The Jewish Week App -- Now Available!
view counter


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Wow, The New York Times is Anti-Semetic, who knew? Is there anything more sad, more pathetic than liberal, secular Jews who bend over backward in their efforts to appear "fair & impartial"?

Unfortunately, the NY Times does not promote journalistic democracy. The Jerusalem Post, on ther other hand, encourages side by side op ed analyses of issues by writers on the left and the right. The Post readers are then able to make informed decisions regarding where they stand on the issues of the day. Since A.M. Rosenthal left the NY Times, the paper's slant against Israel has been pronounced. Apparently, the management of the Times has been directed to present Mr.Tom Friedman as the official commentator on all major issues confronting Israel. A one shot piece by Mr. Netanyahu will not change the "undemocratic" journalism that characterizes the Times regarding Israel. By the way Mr. Goldman, are you aware of the fact that the Jerusalem Post has published full page op eds by Ahmed Tibi, Saeb Erekat and the like? Would the NY Times ever consider publishing Israel articles from journalists of all stripes on a regular basis? I applaud Prime Minister Netanyahu's refusal to write an op piece for the NY Times. I also believe that your opening line about Bibi characterizing him as an American Jew is an offense to all Jews, and especially American Jews. In any vibrant democracy, an individual enjoys the freedom to respond to his conscience without regard to outside interference. You have displayed in your opening sentence to your readers your disregard for Mr. Netanyahu.

How do you have the audacity to say that the NY Times falls into "the middle." You were competent enough to point out the fact that 19 out of the 20 Op-Eds in the NY Times were negative- which you ridiculously put into quotes. This does not represent a balanced view of the NY Times regarding the State of Israel but the opposite. I am seventeen years old and even I can comprehend that. In addition, you pointed something out that only strengthens the reason to why Netanyahu should not write an Op-Ed in the Times. You mentioned how he has written 10 Op-Eds in the past for the Times. It is quite evident that his writing did nothing to help the anti-Israel views of the NY Times. By declining their invitation, Bibi is sending the message that he doesn't think very highly of that "paper of record." I applaud Netanyahu's decision to discontinue for writing for the Times.

Mr Goldman:

I respectfully disagree with your viewpoint that "The best way to counter lies and distortions is with truth" -- that is, in the case of the New York Times. Truth to the editors and publishers of the New York Times is what they print. Their ‘truth’ about Israel is hammered home daily; an occasional response from the other side is but a sop to those who cry foul.

Battling the Times' calumny concerning Israel is to empty the ocean with a fork. Furthermore, the insults to Israel, her leaders, her citizens, do not merit acknowledgment. I'm relieved that Mr. Netanyahu declined the rigged fray with a dignified, "take a hike."

view counter