view counter
‘Voices Of Change’ At The JOFA Conference

Edgy topics and an influx of young people at first international gathering of Orthodox feminists in four years.

Special To The Jewish Week
Photo Galleria: 

Social change within a conservative system is fueled by persistence and tempered with patience. Ever since its beginnings two decades ago around the dining room table of pioneer Blu Greenberg, the association of feminism and Orthodoxy has sparked fierce support, relentless opposition and multitude of questions.

How can a conservative tradition allow for incremental change, much less an eventual paradigm shift, in the status of its women? Is the separate and unequal role of women indivisible from the profound truths and social order of Orthodox Judaism? How can social and religious change continue to come about without destabilizing a centuries-old way of life?

Variations on these questions weaved their way through the responses of over 100 speakers organized into more than 50 panels throughout a buzz-filled day of the eighth international conference of the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance, or JOFA, Sunday at John Jay College. The gathering drew more than 1,000 people from 125 different cities worldwide while, and for the first time, it was live-streamed to hundreds more from as far away as Cape Town, South Africa, and Jerusalem.

In his introductory remarks at the plenary, which opened the Sunday portion of the conference, following a concert and reception Saturday night, Rabbi Asher Lopatin stressed that change is unpredictable, yielding “surprising byproducts and unexpected fallout.” The new president of the controversial Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, a Modern Orthodox rabbinical school in Riverdale, sounded the rallying cry when he said, “This effort is not, as some would have it, just to help women. This is to transform the whole community.”

Rabbi Lopatin’s opening remarks were followed by a last-minute appearance of Israeli Knesset member Ruth Calderon, a self-styled and secular teacher of Talmud. She earned a standing ovation when she reminded the enthusiastic crowd that it is “dispute itself that is Judaism’s chosen path to truth,” because “you really don’t know where you’ll end up.”

The willingness to discuss everything from philanthropy to fertility, sexual abuse to slut-shaming, lent an air of diversity and openness to the non-stop energy of a packed day. While numbers did not dramatically increase since the last JOFA conference four years ago, organizers were gratified by the uptake in male participants and the increasingly youthful crowd. Other notable changes were the cooling of anger that originally fueled much of this activism and a moving away from “meta-issues” to a greater focus on the practical.

JOFA’s president, Judith Heicklen, told the participants that they would be exploring “more intimate, personal subjects, such as money, mikvah, mommy-ing, the challenges of work-life balance.”

The standing-room-only panel on “Educating in the Divine Image: Gender in Jewish Day Schools” was presented by Dr. Chaya R. Gorsetman and JOFA’s executive director, Dr. Elana Maryles Sztokman, co-authors of a well-received book by the same title. Educational approaches, always of central concern to the community, take pride of place when considering practical solutions. The panelists emphasized hands-on redresses of “a hidden curriculum” that too often fosters gender inequality in Orthodox day schools. In an impressive nod to tolerance, Gorsetman also included in her remarks a call for Orthodox day schools to fully recognize the needs of same-sex parents and single mothers by choice.

The essence of their message was that girls often suffer from gender stereotyping that depicts boys studying and girls either cleaning or giggling in school media, while “clouded” assumptions, even among esteemed educators, still assign girls a lower rung in an intellectual hierarchy that most prizes Talmud and math. Many of these ills can be cured with heightened awareness and doable reforms such as careful curating of newsletters, announcements, photos and classroom décor.

The persistent tension between the practical and the more theoretical showed up when Michal Smart, the director of Judaic Studies at the Orthodox Bi-Cultural Day School of Stamford, Conn., asked how the hidden curriculum of gender inequality could be overcome when the Orthodox still overwhelmingly speak of God as male, the foremothers are not mentioned in the liturgy along with the forefathers, and the Hebrew language itself subsumes the feminine within the masculine plural. Her question was much praised but left unanswered — at least for now.

Another unresolved tension surfaced throughout the day after Leah Sarna’s exhortation for increased “religious dedication” inspired rousing applause at the morning’s plenary. The high-energy Yale undergraduate reminded women that real equality meant taking on full responsibilities, such as regular attendance at morning minyan, praying thee times a day, joining a chevruta, or study group, and committing to daf yomi, the study of a page of Talmud a day.

The counter-current was audible, if somewhat less strident. Maharat Rachel Kohl Finegold, one of the first three women to be ordained as Orthodox clergy from Yeshivat Maharat, confessed that her real fantasy is not having to work on Shabbat as rabbis inevitably do, but rather coming late to synagogue, as many other young moms do, and spending more of the day with her three young children. While prominent educators such as Sztokman dismissed neurologically hard-wired gender differences, in a later panel, “Feminist Influence on Halacha,” the question arose as to whether women really wanted to buy into the full way of life of an observant Jew as outlined by men.

Change results from perseverance and always encounters opposition. Rabbi Dov Linzer, dean of YCT, told his audience in one of the later panels, to remain fully confident moving forth, sustained by the assurance that they are defending authentic Torah values. He counseled a non-apologetic approach to opponents. “It is not so much a matter of what allows us to move forward, but what they find in Torah that allows them not to.”

Susan Reimer-Torn is a writer specializing in Jewish women’s issues and author of the upcoming memoir, “Maybe Not Such a Good Girl: Rupture and Redemption Reconsidered.”

Last Update:

12/15/2013 - 04:04
Jewish feminism, JOFA
The Jewish Week App -- Now Available!
view counter


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

The point is that Jewish men are allowed to daven when and to the extent they want. Ergo, not all Jewish men are full-time religiously committed and most attend schul irregularly and do not necessarily daven three times daily.

When they do, nevertheless, they may wear their talitot, and phylacteries and get called up to the Torah. Their integrity in daily life is not questioned and any Cohen may adminster the priestly blessing from the bimah whatever else they do in life.

This brings me to the change we are all striving for - that is, to include Jewish women in davening, being called up to the Torah, reading from the Torah, participating hands on at Kabbalat Shabbat and uttering the Kiddush blessings for the Tsibur.

Likewise, women should not be obliged to be full-time committed religious persons as, say, a woman rabbi, a rabba or a maharat, would be obliged so to do. The professing teachers / clergy formally agree to profess their Judaic Daily Life full time. In turn, women who have other secular careers, as do men, or, in addition, have children or other commitments, should, indeed, be allowed to be called up to the Torah, read from the Torah, on designated occasions when they are able and willing to do so.

Re-interpreting this innate right to active, fully empowered Jewish spiritual participation will automatically remove the "time-bound" obligations reserved, todate, for men. In today's distribution of domestic duties, it is possible even for those women who cannot, say, afford childminders or have not extended family to step in to allow regular attendance or participation, as husbands are frequently disposed to take over those domestic duties while their wife attends a pre-specified synagogue service - be it on Shabbat or weekdays or even chagim.

Finally, it needs to be pointed out, as Prof. Rabbi Sperber constantly brings to our awareness, that none of the above levels of participation have been forbidden by Chazal. There is no such prohibition in the Shulchan Arukh and what has not been forbidden therein, may not be forbidden by later or contemporary batei din, dayanim or rabbis.
In addition, Prof. Rav Sperber emphasises that even though some forms of participation have not been taken up historically for cultural or communal reasons, there is no injunction for these same activities being taken up at a particular moment in time and by a particular community or set of communities. Simply, what has not been forbidden must not and ought not to be forbidden in retrospect.

In conclusion, on behalf of women, as well as myself, we ask that this wonderful gift offered by the JOFA Conference in New York, which I attended, is not left to rusticate. I also beg the movers and shakers among the rabbinical community not to take steps backwards or linger unnecessarily in thought, before bravely coming to positive conclusions and actively enable and empower women towards spiritual equality in Jewish Life.

The question for Orthodox feminists is this:

What is driving you? Is it “A” or “B” as below:

A. Is your motivation really to draw closer to G-d and your desire to do things which were not traditionally done by women in the past is because of this burning desire to get closer to HaShem?
OR is it-
B. Are you motivated by your belief that Orthodox Judaism needs to be fixed and brought up to date with Modern time and the feminist movements which are happening in other areas in the U.S. both in the Jewish and non-Jewish world need to be applied to traditional Orthodox Judaism as we received it today?

The question is what is the motivation of those who are advocating for change in the role women play in Orthodox Judaism?

It seems to me that unfortunately the motivation expressed in this article is B that Judaism as it has been handed down to us isn't good enough and needs to be updated to keep up with modern fads. If that is indeed the motivation than it certainly falls outside the spirit of Torah Judaism which takes the approach that G-d gave us the Torah and it’s mitzvoth and how the leading sages determined it should be practiced and doesn’t need to be fixed.

A good source to see that this is indeed the Torah approach is Rashi on Deut. Chap 17, verses 9-11.
According to the teaching that they teach you and the judgment that they will say to you, shall you do; you shall not deviate from the word that they will tell you, right or left. (Devarim 17:9-11)
Rashi on the above verse: “Right or left:” Even if they say that your right is left and your left is right.

I was struck by your term"the cooling of anger " and " less strident " aspects of the audience or some atendees. . First of all, I find nothing amiss with anger. anger can be a positive emotion and used to push an issue toward resolution. Strident, however, is a buzz word used to undermine feminists and women in general, and offends me deeply. I thought Kohl- feingold's remarks silly. Everyone who works and has a family would like to stay late in bed sometimes and it is not confined to a Maharat. in addition her remark about being post feminism resonated with me as we continue to work for salary parity and parsonage for women like her.

view counter