City Council Bill Would Prevent Regulation Of Circumcision

Councilman Greenfield calls Board of Health interference "outrageous."

09/16/13
Jewish Week Correspondent
Photo Galleria: 

Citing freedom of religion, Councilman David Greenfield has introduced legislation prohibiting the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the Board of Health from taking any formal action against the controversial practice of metzitzah b’peh. 

The legislation, introduced at the Sept. 12 City Council meeting, has since been referred to the Health Committee for hearings. It addresses the Board of Health's requirement last year that mohelim obtain written consent from parents before performing the oral suction practice, which has been linked to dangerous infection.

“This is one of the most outrageous examples of government intruding into the ability of residents to freely practice their religion without restrictions based on questionable findings," said Greenfield, a Democrat, in his remarks, which were forwarded to the press.

"I continue to be outraged that the city took this incredibly misguided step last year, and will fight until the board reverses its decision or this bill becomes law. It is imperative that every citizen, regardless of their particular religion, be able to practice and worship without the fear of being restricted or targeted by their own government.”

A spokesman for Maria Del Carmen Arroyo, who chairs the Health Committee, said she would have no immediate comment on the bill. A Council source said it was unlikely the bill would see a vote before next year.

Samantha Levine, deputy press secretary to Mayor Michael Bloomberg, said in an emailed response to the bill Tuesday that the city was acting to save lives.

“Health Department investigations of newborns with herpes virus between 2000–2013 have shown that 13 infants contracted the herpes virus when mohelim, or ritual circumcisers, placed their mouths directly on the child’s circumcision wound to draw blood away from the circumcision cut," Levine said.

"Two of these babies died. The city's highest obligation is to protect its children and it is critical for parents to know the risks associated with the practice.”

As the mayoral race continues, discussion may increase over the already volatile issue of the rite that doctors claim is medically unsafe. 

“I’ll keep the form in place until we have a better approach,” Democratic mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio has previously said about the issue, referring to the consent forms parents of infants must sign, instituted under the Bloomberg administration. “I want to work with community leaders on something we can all agree upon, that will help protect the safety of our children. I think we can do better.”

Chasidic backers have urged de Blasio, if elected, to immediately revoke the consent decree, which is the object of a federal lawsuit by a group of Orthodox organizations and mohelim who argue that it infinges freedom of religion.

Joseph Lhota, the Republican mayoral candidate, spoke to The Jewish Week about the subject earlier this summer.

“In no way, shape or form should the government get involved as long as they tell the parents what the risks are,” he said, explaining that his views have evolved, and that as mayor he would attempt to repeal the consent form by bringing the issue back to the Board of Health.

Chaim David Zwiebel, executive vice president of Agudath Israel of America, which is a party to the lawsuit against the city, said he had spoken to Greenfield about the issue recently but was not consulted about the bill.

Zwiebel, an attorney and expert on matters of religion and law, added “the most troublesome thing about the city regulation is that it’s the first time ever in the history of this country that bris mila [ritual circumcision] has been regulated in any shape or fashion.”

Asked how the bill, if passed, would affect the lawsuit, Zwiebel said “that hasn’t been discussed internally, but I don’t know if this bill is passing in the foreseeable future. If it does happen, it will have a major impact on our decision-making as we move forward. It could be that there will be no more lawsuit because the judges themselves may decide it.”

Adam Dickter contributed to this report.

editor@jewishweek.org

Last Update:

09/25/2013 - 07:23

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Nowhere in the Torah does it say that circumcision requires that the circumciser's mouth make contact with the freshly circumcised penis. MBP is a human custom, not a religious obligation.
If a boy could reason, would he want MBP done to him? If he could speak, would he object? Is it right to take advantage of the fact that an 8 day old child cannot perceive, reason, and communicate? Is MBP ever performed on adult converts?

The CHILD'S religious freedom and rights outweigh the rights of the parents or desires of their knife-wielding associates to suck fresh penile wounds.

Freedom of religion should never allow anyone to endanger the life or health of a child.

Is Zweibel, an attorney, also going to defend people who refuse their children necessary medical treatment? Will he defend the right of parents to abuse their children?

David, you are darn right the city wants to regulate circumcision to save lives, just as rabbis have going back to 1837 when reknowned rabbinical figure in orthodox circles, Moses Sofer (chasam sofer) banned oral suction because of infections.

Rabbis and health officials who care about child safety and care about scientific conclusions do that. You know better. you are just sacrificing the lives of Jewish children to oblige the chasidic factions of your coalition. You are a disgrace to the rabbinate, and the legal profession.

So, in other words: NYC Councilman David Greenfield and Agudath Israel's David Zwiebel are self righteously fighting for the right to kill babies.

Yes, how DARE the government get involved in the health and well-being of children. Parents should have the unfettered right to submit their children to needless mutilative practices that put them at risk for infection, penile ablation and even death. Shame on New York.

How hypocritical of councilman David Greenfield to cite the right to freedom of religion in this argument while ignoring the right to bodily integrity of the individual, in this case, a child who cannot consent to a painful and out-dated practice.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.