view counter
Sharpton Reflects On Crown Heights Mistakes
Says his tone "exacerbated tensions and played to extemists;" Norman Rosenbaum says apology is missing.
Assistant Managing Editor
Photo Galleria: 

Rev. Al Sharpton did not understand the extent of the violence during the 1991 Crown Heights riots when he initially entered the neighborhood, the activist wrote in an op-ed in the New York Daily News published Sunday.

"I did not know the full volatility of the situation," Reverend Sharpton wrote.

In a detailed account of his actions in the aftermath of the accidental death of Gavin Cato and the murder of Yankel Rosenbaum, prompted by the 20th anniversary, Sharpton concedes to longstanding criticism that his presence in the area and his angry eulogy for Gavin fanned the conflict.

"We had our marches and they were all peaceful," he wrote. "But with the wisdom of hindsight let's be clear. Our language and tone sometimes exacerbated tensions and played to the extremists rather than raising the issue of the value of this young man whom we were so concerned about."

The reverend also reflects on his use of the term "diamond merchants" at the funeral, which he said referred to "the likes of the Oppenheimer family" in South Africa.

"Extremists seized upon that to say that I was calling all Jews diamond merchants and I spent years defending the statement rather than recognizing that in hours of tension, one must be clearer than at any other time."

Rosenbaum's brother, Norman, said he was not impressed with the reflection. "I don't hear the words 'I apologize', " Rosenbaum said on Sunday, suggesting that Reverend Sharpton might have been moved to write the piece only because he now hosts a talk show on MSNBC and wants to shed the baggage. "As far as I'm concerned it's just a cynical attempt to appease those who haven't forgotten the truth."

It was not the first time Reverend Sharpton reexamined the Cato eulogy. Ten years ago, in attempting to build a coalition with Jewish leaders against slavery in Sudan, he told The Jewish Week when asked about the diamond merchants remark  "Maybe because of the sensitivity at that time, that was not the right time to say it." He also called on leaders of major Jewish organizations then to sit down with him for an extensive dialogue to clear up differences, but none took him up on it, saying he had yet to fully take responsibility for his actions.

Reverend Sharpton's tone in the Daily News article contrasts with that of a letter to Rabbi Marc Schneier of the Hampton Synagogue he wrote on Thursday. In canceling his participation in a forum on black-Jewish relations 20 years after Crown Heights, he said  "I have made mistakes in my career, but the allegations around Crown Heights, which is proven to be patently untrue, was not one of them."

But in both the letter and op-ed, Sharpton insists he is not the same man he was then. "Twenty years later, I have grown. I would still have stood up for Gavin Cato, but I would have also included in my utterances that there was no justification or excuse for violence or the death of Yankel Rosenbaum."

The reverend then recalled a meeting during his youth with Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel at the Jewish Theological Seminary, in which the Jewish civil rights leader and supporter of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. told him "only big men can achieve big things." Reverend Sharpton said he wishes he had shared that encounter at Gavin Cato's funeral.

"Crown Heights showed me how some of us, in our smallness, can divide," he wrote.

In response to The Jewish Week's requests for an interview, a spokeswoman for Reverend Sharpton last week said he was unavailable at the time because of the demands of taping a talk show on MSNBC, but would agree to a future availability.

Last Update:

08/25/2011 - 09:23

view counter

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

As Norman Rosenbaum said, there was no apology. Sharprton is trying to whotewash his past to advance as a pundit. I don't thinl many are fooled.

As I expected, Sharpton has not changed his spots, he is basically in deny and deflect responsibility mode. Sharpton has made a career out of exploiting racial tensions in the US. From my vantage point, he is not a reconciler; he is an instigator.
I don't think we should underestimate the huge improvements that have occurred in equality of opportunity among the races. Sharpton should be happy, and gratified, but he is not. He is still fanning the same dying embers.
When people like Sharpton agitate continuously for more and more, they are part of the problem - not the solution. Last week, 111 black firefighters in Chicago won a compensation case for between $30-$45 million. That's a lot money, which the cash strapped taxpayers don't have. Obama agreed to pay the black farmers of Georgia $1.25 billion. Congress has yet to release the money, however. My point is that Sharpton's strategy works- guilty whites are having to pay for past 'misdeeds' that may never have actually occurred. I'm a poor Jewish white guy. I know I'm hosed and no one is representing me.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.