view counter
ADL Supports Inclusion of WTC Cross In 9/11 Memorial
Photo Galleria: 

The Anti-Defamation League said it supports the inclusion of the World Trade Center Cross in the permanent memorial to 9/11 victims at Ground Zero.

The cross-shaped steel beams were found in the rubble at the site of the World Trade Center following the 9/11 attacks and were moved last month to a permanent location in the 8-square-acre memorial.

The American Atheists organization, which advocates an "absolute separation" of government and religion, filed a lawsuit last month against including the cross in the permanent memorial to the victims of 9/11 in lower Manhattan. In the lawsuit, the group said the cross is unconstitutional, calling it a "mingling of church and state."

"ADL fully supports the inclusion in the National September 11 Memorial and Museum of the metal beams in the shape of a cross found in the rubble at Ground Zero in the aftermath of the tragic attacks on 9/11," the ADL said in a statement.

"Allowing this cross to be included in the memorial along with other artifacts found at the site does not constitute government endorsement of a religious message. Rather, it is an acknowledgement that these beams – part of the infrastructure of one of the towers – acquired historical significance by giving comfort to many who lost loved ones in the attacks, as well as those who spent days and weeks sifting through the ash and debris."

"The beams have been a part of the scene at Ground Zero ever since 9/11, and their inclusion in the memorial is appropriate."

Last Update:

09/13/2011 - 05:14
9/11, American Atheists organization, Anti-Defamation League, Ground Zero, World Trade Center Cross
The Jewish Week App -- Now Available!
view counter


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

This article gives me an inappropriate warm and fuzzy feeling; inappropriate because, as a 7th Day Adventist (I almost wrote "7th Day Advocate," oddly inappropriate in its own way), I'm not supposed to like the cross. When I had first been introduced to my imaginary friend, Jesus, (when I still didn't like or trust St. Paul), I also really didn't like the cross, for different reasons. So now I like the cross? This is just wrong. But, damn me if this article didn't give me this warm, fuzzy feeling.

(Sorry Carl Sagan. Sorry Richard Dawkins.)

IF the cross comforts people great. rabbi dr. bernhard rosenberg

view counter