Reconsidering Monica Lewinsky

Should the stain of a youthful mistake last forever?

07/01/14
Contributing Editor
Photo Galleria: 
Heather Robinson
Heather Robinson

In June’s Vanity Fair magazine, Monica Lewinsky, now 40, asks the world to reconsider who she is. In her essay, “Shame and Survival,” she writes about how, since 1998, when the news broke about her affair with former President Bill Clinton, humiliation has been her constant companion. She calls out women who consider themselves feminists, some of whom piled on the public humiliation of a then-24-year-old while, in many cases, giving a pass to the then 52-year-old Clinton for his behavior. In particular, she cites a gathering of the “New York Supergals” — a group of feminists who met to publicly dish about the scandal after it broke.

Lewinsky comes across as intelligent, reflective and sensitive in raising awareness about an important issue: what she terms the “culture of humiliation.” She writes, “ ... the Internet has seismically shifted the tone of our interactions. The ease, the speed, and the distance that our electronic devices afford us can also make us colder, more glib, and less concerned about the consequences of our pranks and prejudice.”

While she writes, “In 1998, when news of my affair with Bill Clinton broke, I was arguably the most humiliated person in the world,” she does not play the victim. She makes clear, as she did then, that the affair, which began when she was 22, was consensual. She cites the case of Tyler Clementi, an 18-year-old Rutgers freshman who, after a video of him kissing another man went viral on social media, killed himself by jumping off the George Washington Bridge. She wishes she could have told Clementi “that I knew a little of how it might have felt for him to be exposed before the world,” but does not equate herself with Clementi as innocent; unlike him, she writes, her humiliation resulted at least partially from her “poor choices.” At more than one point, she writes, she felt suicidal, and her mother feared she would be “humiliated to death.”

Lewinsky’s effort to raise awareness about the value of respecting the humanity of the individuals about whom we blog and Tweet is important. If you wouldn’t say it to the person’s face, why should you say it in cyberspace?

Moreover, reading the piece got me thinking: What does Lewinsky’s ongoing humiliation suggest about our society?

Is her life on its margins (she writes about her difficulty finding work and being taken seriously, despite her masters degree in social psychology from the London School of Economics) so different from that of a woman in Victorian times who got caught in an affair?

I’m not arguing that infidelity is acceptable, but that, at a time when promiscuity is celebrated (“Sex and the City,” anyone?) it seems unfair that this particular individual is singled out for shame. Is Lewinsky a societal scapegoat, paying the personal price for our collective crumbling standards?

Or is this a case of misogyny?

In many parts of the Muslim world, young women are demonized and even killed for sexual relations outside of marriage. While one person I interviewed argued “that is very different because in the Muslim world, women are physically attacked for falling in love,” I can’t help but wonder if Lewinsky’s humiliation does not bear some faint echo of that type of abuse. And who says she didn’t fall in love? (She writes, “my love life, my sex life, my most private moments, my most sensitive secrets, had been broadcast around the globe.”)

Jewish opinion-makers and other New Yorkers seem to feel it’s time to remove Lewinsky’s "scarlet letter," and more than one noted the lack of balance in the public’s treatment of her versus its treatment of former President Clinton.

“It took two to tango,” said Allison Josephs, proprietor of the blog Jewinthecity.com, dedicated to combating anti-Orthodox prejudice. “He was an adult, he was the President, and she was an intern, so he should probably have been held to a higher standard of accountability, yet he got a pass from the public while she did not.”

In terms of whether the public should forgive, Josephs noted, “sincere regret and changed behavior” should prompt forgiveness and in Judaism, “Public embarrassment is likened to killing someone so that’s off the table.”

Some believe Lewinsky’s teshuvah should be public.

“I’m sure she has a beautiful soul and I can certainly support her cause [against Internet/social media shaming], but let her apologize to Hillary Clinton and show her altruistic side,” said Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, author of “Kosher Lust.” If Lewinsky wants to rehabilitate her image, the rabbi argues, “let her volunteer at a Jewish school or become the spokesperson for the sanctity of marriage.”

Regular New Yorkers seem to think Lewinsky deserves a clean slate. “Everyone has the right to move on, and she doesn’t? It doesn’t seem fair,” said Alvaro Salazar, 37, a West Village designer. “Come on, she didn’t kill anybody.”

“He was President of the United States, and she was a young woman,” said Hannah Goldstein, 43, a Manhattan photographer. “She made a young person’s foolish mistake, but who hasn’t?”

In her essay, Lewinsky writes she would have appreciated some “good, old-fashioned, girl-on-girl support” at the time of her exposure.

By and large, it seems she has it now.

editor@jewishweek.org

Last Update:

07/05/2014 - 22:48

Get The Jewish Week Newsletter

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Comments

To be quite honest - her choice and Clinton's choice were their own to live with. Everyone on earth makes mistakes - anyone who says different, is lying. We are not living in a perfect world - therefore, mistakes are a reality. People make choices in life that are not always the wisest - but I have yet to meet ONE person who fulfills a totally wise and mistake free existence...even the most Orthodox of Jews, make mistakes, we are here to learn from them, and not repeat them. If she has done that, then she deserves forgiveness but not from humanity, from G-d. We don't technically have the power to forgive, nor judge...why people think they do, is beyond me. Just live life, be happy and keep building yourself to be a better human being - when you meet your maker, despite your mistakes, you showed that you can grow from them and move beyond them...

July 4, 2014
It seems to me that the author of this
article and the respondents miss the point.
First of all, the different treatment awarded
Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky was not
a sexual double standard but had to do with
three different factors. First of all, there was a
different in very standing these individuals had.
President Clinton had a long public reputation to
bank on; Monica Lewinsky did not. Had Monica
Lewinsky had a long career as an actress or
reporter the public would have been more forgiving.
Secondly, Bill Clinton benefited from the correct
perception that his political and legal enemies
were abusing their abuse over the Paula Jones
scandal as a whole. ( No American should have had
to answer the types of questions that Clinton had
to during the deposition and the Impeachment was
ridiculous. ). Thirdly, what went on
between Lewinsky and Clinton as long as it was
consensual should not haven been anybody else's
business besides G-d, Hilary Clinton and the
individuals themselves. The public apology tour
of Bill Clinton and the public disgrace of Monica
Lewinsky should never have happened.

ALAN LEVIN

This young woman has been demonized far too much and for far too long. As you so correctly point out, who among us has not made a foolish mistake on the way to full adulthood? She was a kid, a new intern, and he was the President of the United States. The shame belongs to Clinton, and all the "feminists" who criticized her or just remained silent.

We all know the culture in The Beltway . When interning for politicians on both sides of the aisle this kind of promiscuity is par for the course. Maybe we all should do teshuva and educate our daughters not to work in such loose environments

I'm sure Monica felt pressured to be "nice" to the President's advances, as otherwise should possibly felt that she could have been sacked from the intern position.

Great article! Lewinsky has nothing to atone for as far as the general public is concerned. The only person to whom she ever owed an apology were those she hurt by her actions. She was a private person -- an unknown. The President, by merit of his office, and accountable for much more and accountable to many more. Sadly, a 24-year-old intern handled the scandal with a lot more grace and poise than the POTUS did.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.