Gold for Rubashkin or Guatemalans?
04/15/10
Special to the Jewish Week

"Gold drive for Rubashkin!" read the subject line in my inbox. I knew that millions were being spent to defend Sholom Rubashkin, but when I read the email calling people to donate their gold to the defense fund, I was shocked. This gold drive, combined with a petition to the US Attorney seeking to get 50,000 signatures asking for better treatment of Rubashkin, is being pitched under the premise of the mitzvah of "Pidyon Shevyuiim" (redeeming of captives). In the olden days, Jews would be captured by corrupt governments and ransomed, thus there was a mitzvah to redeem these captives. The appeal to this mitzvah in the Rubashkin case is erroneous and misleading.

I recently encountered signs posted around Brooklyn calling the community to rally to Rubashkin's defense. Surprised and confused, I wondered how a small segment of the Jewish community was now holding values that were a complete anathema to me.

Don't get me wrong; I feel bad for Sholom Rubashkin. I wish he could have celebrated Passover his family. American prisons are not good places to be. But in America, the Jewish community (Jewish legal authorities included) has decided that we live in a just state and we are bound by the laws of the land. When a Jew is arrested by American security officials with immense evidence against him, we cannot immediately cry anti-Semitism and call for "redeeming the captive."

On May 12, 2008 the largest immigration raid in U.S. history was carried out at the country's largest producer of kosher meat in America-the Rubashkins' Agriprocessors plant. Sholom Rubashkin was charged with over 9,000 violations of child labor laws. He was convicted in November 2009 on 86 charges of financial fraud. Other allegations emerged of severe mistreatment of workers, especially the 389 immigrants arrested on the day of the raid. In addition, the raid destroyed the economic infrastructure of Postville, Iowa, shrinking its population to half what it was before the raid and thousands of immigrants' lives were shattered.

Uri L'Tzedek (The Orthodox Social Justice Movement) launched an international boycott the week of the raid and around 2,000 Rabbis and Jewish leaders signed on. The Rubashkins sent a team to negotiate with Uri L'Tzedek including Aaron Rubashkin's son-in-law Milton Balkany who, incidentally, was charged this February with trying to extort $4 million from a hedge fund.

While in Postville with Uri L'Tzedek, one face that will remain eternally plastered in my consciousness and memory is that of Maria who had worked at the factory for over 12 years under intolerable conditions. She explained through tears how she had worked, often for 14 to 15 hours a day, for less than minimum wage. Her husband had been imprisoned in the wake of the raid and was eventually deported. Their family was torn apart, their dreams shattered. The food industry in America relies upon immigrant workers like Maria, documented and not, yet we seem to punish them over and over. Those immigrant workers who had been providing kosher meat for American Jews for years were jailed and deported.

The Torah reminds us no less than 36 times of our obligations to love and care for the strangers and immigrants in our midst. So a few weeks ago, two years after I traveled to Postville, I staffed a service-learning mission for AJWS to Guatemala, the home country of most of the 270 deported workers, to work with families in poor rural villages. Sitting in a shack, I heard some of the most distressing stories about how families rely upon their relatives working in the states to survive and to put their children through school. You can see a short interview I conducted with a wife of a restaurant worker.

I left this village asking myself: where are all the kosher consumers looking to assist these hundreds of exploited workers with their legal fees and resettlement costs? Why are we treating the owner of the company like an innocent captive and raising millions of dollars to defend him while ignoring the needs of the workers in such a precarious predicament?

Some have claimed that the charges against Rubashkin were abnormally harsh, but they seem unaware that the charges against the workers were the toughest mass application to date of criminal charges against undocumented workers (5 months in prison and deportation).

Immigration specialists have referred to the aftermath of the Agriprocessors raid as "a miscarriage of justice" for the workers while Congressmen have asserted that the case "did not comport with the requirement of the law." If Rubashkin is being treated unfairly in any way in the justice system, that must be addressed. No one should be oppressed, neither Rubashkin nor the 400 workers that got arrested in Postville. One must consider priorities in these cases and the message sent by defending the owner's case to the exclusion of the hundreds of workers.

Here are three things you can do to have an immediate impact:

1) Give a contribution to the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) which is working on immigration reform,

2) Make a loan to workers in Guatemala through KIVA,

3) Support Uri L'Tzedek's Tav HaYosher (the ethical seal securing the rights of workers based upon US law).

The gold drive sends the message to the American public that Jews value the welfare of one Jewish man over the well-being-and perhaps the survival-of hundreds of struggling immigrants.

It sends the pejorative message to the many Guatemalan villages to which these workers returned that the Jewish people are not their partners. Enough! The Jewish community should seek to support victims and be upholders of justice, especially when a fellow Jew was the proponent of injustice. Let's get our priorities straight! We should always strive to love our fellow Jew, but at what cost to our commandment to love and care for the stranger and most vulnerable.
 

Shmuly Yanklowitz is the Founder & President of Uri L’Tzedek, a 4th year rabbinical school student at Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, an alum of the Wexner Graduate Fellowship, and a 4th year PHD candidate at Columbia University in Moral Psychology & Epistemology.
.

 

 

Signup for our weekly email newsletter here.

Check out the Jewish Week's Facebook page and become a fan!  And follow the Jewish Week on Twitter: start here.

 

Last Update:

11/02/2011 - 07:16

Comments

Dear Mr. Yanklowitz

It is very sad to read your article, and to follow your reasoning. It is so grossly crooked, wicked and and a distortion of factualities, that it makes the actions you have taken against Mr. Rubashkin profoundly wicked and obviously self serving. I hope you reconsider your actions, and make public awareness of your mistake, that has done so much harm to an innocent family.

b.s.d. 5/17/2010 Shalom u'vraha. After leaving today my comments to this article, it was disappointing to not see them posted. I hope you have enough courage to post my comments. I also hope that maybe you even have enough courage to respond to the comments. Sincerely and respectfully.
b.s.d. 5/17/2010, erev Hag Shavuot. Dear Shmuly and other respected readers: After reading this article at the suggestion of my friend, I feel compelled to raise a few questions and/or comments on this article: 1) Quote from the article: "On May 12, 2008 the largest immigration raid in U.S. history was carried out at the country's largest producer of kosher meat in America-the Rubashkins' Agriprocessors plant. Sholom Rubashkin was charged with over 9,000 violations of child labor laws. He was convicted in November 2009 on 86 charges of financial fraud". Comment: The link of events as presented is ILLOGICAL and defies common sense: Immigration raid --> Charges of violation of child labor laws --> Conviction of financial fraud. It does not make sense: immigration raid should have resulted in violations of immigration-related laws, NOT child labor laws; secondly, violation of child labor laws should have produced the convictions for child labor, NOT for financial fraud. Doesn't this sequence feel a bit of a stretch of the logic and common sense? 2) Quote from the article: "Other allegations emerged of severe mistreatment of workers, especially the 389 immigrants arrested on the day of the raid". Comment/question: The allegations that EMERGED were truly numerous in both number and variety. For example, on the National Public Radio (NPR) there was an allegation of "crystal methamphetamine lab inside the meatpacking plant". See this link: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=90603031&ps=rs Why would a JEW quote ALLEGATIONS made about other Jews without establishing those allegations as facts? In the past, there were allegations that Jews were killing other religions' children to use the children's blood to bake matza for Passover. Should we also quote such allegations and apply them to other Jews? 3) Quote from the article: "Uri L'Tzedek (The Orthodox Social Justice Movement) launched an international boycott the week of the raid and around 2,000 Rabbis and Jewish leaders signed on". Comment/question: Who were the "Jewish LEADERS" that signed off on the international boycott? Among the orthodox Jews, leaders of the Jews are usually considered among Gedoley Ha-Dor: Roshey Yeshivot or Kolelim, poskim, rebbes, talmidei hahamim, etc. If you claim your movement to be orthodox, why doesn't your article mention any names of these Jewish LEADERS who signed on to the international boycott? What are the names of those Jewish "leaders"? Please kindly share with the readers the names of the leaders! I presume that the "leaders" who signed the international boycott would not mind to have their names mentioned publicly. 4) Quote from the article: "She (a lady immigrant worker) explained through tears how she had worked, often for 14 to 15 hours a day, for less than minimum wage". Comments/questions: Each state of the USA has a "minimum wage" law. Has it been established in the Court of Law that this lady's wages were "less than minimum"? And was she REALLY forced to work those long hours? I remember when I worked at an hourly job in the kosher food industry here in the States and needed the money really badly, I was only HAPPY to grab every opportunity to work overtime (14 hrs/day+) and earn the overtime wages. So, were the small wages and long hours really the TRUE cause of her tears? Since the article says that her husband was IMPRISONED and DEPORTED and her "family was TORN APART", could that be the REAL reason for her tears? Were this lady's tears caused by the blessing of having the opportunity to earn extra "overtime" money, or was it the "family torn apart"? 5) Quote from the article: "The Torah reminds us no less than 36 times of our obligations to love and care for the strangers and immigrants in our midst". Comment/question: Doesn't this refer to "gerim"? I thought the term "ger" halahically refers to converts, NOT to "strangers and immigrants". Please correct me if I'm wrong. 6) Quote from the article: "Jewish community should seek to support victims and be upholders of justice, especially when a fellow Jew was the proponent of injustice". Comment/question: Exactly of what kind was the "injustice" that this fellow Jew was a proponent of? Was it related to immigration, or to child labor, or to financial fraud, or the meth lab on the plant's premises? I wish all Jews Hag Shavuot Kasher ve'Sameah, and look forward to see a response to these questions. Sincerely and respectfully.
Well deserved ! Rubashkin deserves fully what he got. Not only did he mistreat the workers but he ran a veritable torture chamber for the unfortunate animals which ended up in his place. That was documented on film ! Anonymous II
pathetic
Shkoyach! Well said. Glad to hear religious Jews speaking up for what is right. I am ashamed of our frum community when I get e-mails asking me to send money for Sholom Rubashkin's legal fund. His actions are a shonde and he deserves to receive consequences for them the same as any non-Jew would in this situation.
the problem is that no non Jew would receive this level of punishment. I dont think anyone is saying that what he did was right; but others in the recent past who were punished for similar behavior were given a slap on the hand- NOT life in prison!! This article misses the main point at hand and is missing basic facts...

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.