Beit Shemesh And Torah Sages

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

The recent incident in Beit Shemesh has made waves in the media and elsewhere, starting from the yeshiva world down to the most secular. They all appropriately condemn reprehensible acts of this fanatic mob.

This whole incident has been discussed in your editorial of Jan. 6, “Beyond Beit Shemesh.” What is most disturbing in that editorial is the advice of Rabbi Shaul Robinson of Lincoln Square Synagogue who is annoyed by the fact that the Agudath Israel organization and especially its “revered Torah scholars” have not sufficiently condemned the shameful incident.

Rabbi Robinson should realize that the Agudah learned the hard way from past experiences to refrain from mixing into matters that are outside its limits. We are complimenting today’s “sages.” At least they are aware of their limitations.

We are celebrating the 100th anniversary of Agudath Israel. At the time when it was founded, the pride and glory of this group was that one of its sponsors was the giant of his time, the world famous Rabbi Chaim Brisker (Soloveitchik). Without his participation and consent the Agudah would never have come into life. However after the opening conference in Katowitz of 300 delegates from all over the globe, the rabbi realized there were elements who would later use the organization for self-serving purposes. He made numerous conditions, which many could not fulfill, and he would not have an active part anymore. He was very outspoken and said that in our generation we are not the guardians of Torah to tell others. Our task is to make sure that our kehillos [communities] are not influenced by the winds that are swept against the total purity of Jewishness. That in itself is a tremendous work. Let us concentrate on that.

If we follow that road, we will have consequentially influenced others. In our orphaned generation, all we can do is to build yeshivot and Torah centers so that King Moshiach will have residences at his hopefully speedy arrival, Amen.

 

Read more:

Comments

The Jewish Week welcomes comments on our stories and encourages discussions germane to our articles. But we will not become a platform for screaming matches or personal attacks against individuals, organizations or religious or political perspectives.

Commenting guidelines:

  • Be clear and stay on topic
  • Avoid objectionable language
  • Be short; comments longer than 300 words will be rejected
  • Be civil; name calling in any form will not be tolerated, and comments that denigrate any religion or Jewish religious stream will always be rejected.
  • Comments meant primarily to advertise a business or organization will be rejected

I don't see the reticence on the part of Agudah to comment on many other aspects of Jewish life that have nothing to do with them. Why is it only on this that they are so reluctant?

Rabbi Eismann's thesis is that Agudath Israel's role is to criticize the outside world but not to do any self criticism. According to this logic Agudaa's programs about economic crimes and it's session training rabbis to deal with sexual abuse in the Orthodox community were a mistake. A leadership that avoids any internal problems will not be respected.

Rabbi Eiseman wrote:
"Rabbi Robinson should realize that the Agudah learned the hard way from past experiences to refrain from mixing into matters that are outside its limits. We are complimenting today’s 'sages.' At least they are aware of their limitations."

What Rabbi Weiss in Riverdale does has nothing to do with the Agudah. Yet the released not one, but two statements in a short period of time about him. OTOH, we see the tepid statement about Bet Shemesh, and next to nothing about molestation of children.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.