Skepticism Over Syria
Tue, 01/04/2011

With Israeli-Palestinian negotiations back in the deep freeze, the past few days have seen a flurry of speculation about possible movement on the Israel-Syrian diplomatic front. Last month President Barack Obama appointed the first ambassador to Damascus since 2005. This week Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice president of the Presidents Conference, met with Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus, prompting speculation he was there at the behest of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

While there are signs of movement, we remain skeptical. We’ve seen this movie before. In 1998, Netanyahu engaged his friend, Jewish philanthropist Ronald Lauder, to take part in back-channel talks with Syrian President Hafez Assad, father of the current president. In the end, though, both leaders got cold feet.

There’s little question the details of an agreement with Syria are far simpler than any likely arrangement with the Palestinians. For all its faults, the Syrian regime is a real government, able to conclude a deal on behalf of the entire nation — unlike a Palestinian leadership divided between Fatah in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza. What’s more, a genuine peace agreement with Syria could put an end to the mounting threat from Hezbollah, based in a Lebanon that remains under the Syrian thumb, and could weaken Iranian influence in the region.

That’s the logic of negotiations, but there’s very little indication that logic will prevail this time around any more than it has in the past when it comes to Israel-Syria talks.

The younger Assad has shown few signs he is more courageous or farsighted than his late father. He has done nothing to curb the growing power of Hezbollah. On the contrary, WikiLeaks cables reveal Syria is supplying advanced missiles and other weapons to the terror group. Syria’s alliance with Iran remains unbroken. And there’s no indication Assad has dropped the demand that Israel withdraw from the Golan Heights as a precondition of negotiations.

Supporters of Netanyahu, who campaigned on a promise to retain the Golan Heights, say his coalition is too weak to withstand a West Bank withdrawal. It is difficult to believe he would find it much easier to conclude a deal that would return the strategically and economically important Golan Heights to Syria.

By all means, talk to Syria and probe for openings; talking is always better than fighting. But pardon us if we don’t break out the champagne just yet to toast the resumption of Syrian-Israeli talks.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Comments

Im syrian and Im all for it...and to "syrian" above...the only citizens he's oppressing are the crazy islamic fanatics...the fact that they are the regimes main opposition is one of the country's most redeeming factors...He can make peace and enforce it...and his vision for the country is exactly what the middle east needs..stability, economic progress, secularism and investment in ppl...all things being promoted strongly by the regime...The syrian ppl are happy to finally be opening to the world and peace with israel is consistent with that policy...goodwill may not be universal and it will take time...but peace is about reconciling enemies after all...
"For all its faults, the Syrian regime is a real government, able to conclude a deal on behalf of the entire nation". Is this how one interprets an authoritarian regime oppressing its citizens? Representing entire the nation? Peace is real when it happens between two peoples, and not between one nation and a man not recognized nor voted for as president.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.