Murdoch’s Mess, Israel’s Concern
Tue, 07/19/2011

One of the ripple effects from the phone hacking scandal that has gripped Britain is concern over whether the Rupert Murdoch media empire’s strong support for Israel would continue if the founder of News Corp. loses his clout.

The 80-year-old media baron has been humbled in recent days, apologizing for the scandal that has prompted outrage in Parliament and among many in Britain for its wide and nasty reach, illegally probing the private lives of royalty, celebrities and even a young murder victim, and spreading to charges of bribing the police for confidential information.

Murdoch, his son, James, and Rebekah Brooks, the former chief executive of the shamed and shuttered News Of The World, testified before Parliament on Tuesday. They said they had no knowledge of the illegal hacking.

While Murdoch may be deeply resented in England, his longtime and outspoken support for Israel has made him a respected figure there and in the U.S. Jewish establishment.

“My own perspective is simple: We live in a world where there is an ongoing war against the Jews,” Murdoch said last October at an Anti-Defamation League dinner in his honor.

In 2009, on being honored by the American Jewish Committee, he noted: “In the West, we are used to thinking that Israel cannot survive without the help of Europe and the United States. Tonight I say to you, maybe we should start wondering whether we in Europe and the United States can survive if we allow the terrorists to succeed in Israel.”

Now Jewish leaders are wondering if the pro-Israel stance of Murdoch’s media empire, including, in this country, the Wall Street Journal, New York Post and Fox News, can survive a post-Murdoch era.

Truth is, the above news organizations and others in the Murdoch fleet have long been pro-Israel.

The more pressing question of the moment is whether Murdoch can succeed in distancing himself from a scandal for which he has apologized and expressed humility but refused to accept responsibility. In the meantime, a seamy side of tabloid journalism has been exposed. But it should be noted that it was the press – not Parliament or Scotland Yards – that brought the scandal to light, underscoring the influence, for good or evil, the media can wield.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Comments

what has been very conspicuously unmentioned is that many other british publications did the same things that murdoch's publication is accused of, and this information was discussed in an article about a year ago in the new york times. no one seemed to care and there was no apparent follow up, until now. and surprise, surprise, only the media people that are supportive of israel are being attacked in the media now. it makes me wonder about conspiracy theories. or maybe i shouldn't wonder and just assume that there is one and that is why only murdoch is being pilloried.

An apropos blog entry on American Thinker titled "Rupert Murdoch's Journalism, and that of the NY Times" http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/07/rupert_murdochs_journalism_and_that_of_the_ny_times.html -- no ethics at Rupert Murdoch's publication, no journalism at NY Times and suchlike. Which serves the reader better???

Perhaps we should be concerned about why we are concerned over the future of someone with apparently horrible business ethics. After all, we believe that we will be judged on how honest we conducted business.

lovely so your concern is how this reflect on Murdoch's pro Israel stance. Wonder where your scruples hide,if they exist.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.