Wrong On Targeted Boycott
Thu, 04/17/2014

Alan M. Dershowitz writes that a targeted boycott of settlement products is “bigoted in effect if not in intent” (“Marching Together For Israel,” Opinion, April 11.) He goes on to liken such a boycott to Harvard’s limit on Jewish applicants. The writer is far off the mark on both assertions.

Our refusal to purchase products from Israeli settlements in the West Bank comes from a deep love of Israel and a firm understanding of its founding principles. We do not engage in targeted boycotts of China or Russia because we are a Zionist organization and our primary and unique concern is Israel’s well being as a democratic state committed to the Jewish values of equality and social justice for all.

The writer claims that he is also “a strong supporter of the two-state solution,” and yet he has no qualms about financially supporting one of the core obstacles to an agreement. That the Palestinian Authority has not yet reached an agreement with Israel does not legitimize either the occupation nor illegal settlement growth, and when the writer compares our policies to anti-Semitic policies, like Harvard’s past Jewish quota, he dilutes and obscures the real meaning of anti-Semitism.

Acting Executive Director, Partners for Progressive Israel

 

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Comments

The author of this letter does not no the history of this conflict. To keep making comments that use the words occupation when all the archeological evidence in what he terms as occupied territories is Jewish shows that the Jews were there first.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.