Responding To Intermarriage
Wed, 10/02/2013

In response to Gary Rosenblatt’s column, “Not Too Late To Push In-Marriage?” (Sept. 13), [and Rabbi Jack Wertheimer’s call for aggressively advocating for in-marriage]: Does anyone seriously believe that a serious, committed Jew loses his or her commitment to Judaism because he or she intermarries?

What is happening is the opposite of what people like Wertheimer are saying: people don’t intermarry and then lose their commitment to Judaism. They lose their commitment and then have no reason not to intermarry.

The effort to prevent intermarriage has to be stood on its head: we need to find ways to convince our youngsters to be serious Jews. Intermarriage will then take care of itself.

Obviously we are failing at this. For one thing, we often continue to act as if we believe that “serious, committed” means Orthodox. It is clear from the data that such an argument doesn’t work. Yes, I know about Orthodox triumphalism. I also know the data from the 2000/2001 National Jewish Population Study shows that the Orthodox lost more members than they gained as ba’alei teshuva, or returnees to the faith.

So Orthodoxy is no solution to our problem. I think the solution lies in facing the reality of contemporary America: our young have the choice of being or not being Jews. That’s what freedom means. We need to compete for their loyalty, and it’s clear that their loyalty can only be won in the context of the rest of their lives, i.e. as Americans.

The article says that what Wertheimer says is hard to hear. Actually it is easy compared to the truth: Judaism as it is today can’t compete with being American. Solving this problem requires honesty and courage, not a self-righteous assumption of the “superiority” of Jewish life.

(online comment)

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Comments

This study highlights two problems:

1. The failure of the liberal movements in Judaism
2. The failure of the American Jewish community as a whole

Aliyah would go a long way in minimizing these problems.

David Mollen nails it - and the Pew Survey released Monday quantifies it: liberal Judaism has yet to field "product" that successfully competes with what is available to American Jews in the open cultural and spiritual marketplace - even in our current era of more than majority resurgence of interest in spirituality. Both federation/agency-led "renewal" and every shade of Denomination-led "outreach" have dismally failed to turn the tide of liberal Jewish disinterest and disappearance.

Our only realistic hope is for our "Masters of the Universe" - Judaism's most personally successful sons and daughters, our storied hero-entrepreneurs, to become passionately, and hands-on - no longer merely EVEN MEGA-philanthropically - interested in doing for Judaism precisely like what several - like Jerry Levin and Ron Perelman - have done for themselves in their own business lives - focusing on Judaism's core business - in the Torah's language, "bringing God's Presence clearly within each one of us" - and re-tooling how Judaism effectively offers this product to American Jews, in order to radically recapture "market share" in the midst of so many, valuable, varied and easily available options.

May the G!d who is interested in using Israel as a light to the nations, open their hearts to do it!

Sincerely,
Rabbi Steve Blumberg
New York, NY

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.