Failed Analogy
Thu, 04/17/2014

In defending a gendered Orthodox Judaism (“Why a Gendered Judaism Makes Sense,” Opinion online), Rabbis Chaim Strauchler and Joshua Strulowitz ask why “a standard for egalitarian living would be demanded of religion, but not from the marketplace or from popular culture.”

This argument by analogy fails to take into account that societal gender norms are not binding on any person — no girl is prohibited from wearing blue, and men have the freedom to see romantic comedies if they enjoy them. The prescriptive halachic gender roles Rabbis Strauchler and Strulowitz defend, on the other hand, do not accommodate or even acknowledge the many women and men who do not comfortably fit traditional models of femininity and masculinity.

Worse, this comparison to the secular world completely ignores the

workplace and academy, where egalitarianism is expected (even if not always realized). It’s hard to imagine that Rabbis Strauchler and Strulowitz would send their daughters to schools that refused to teach girls math or science. Or defend corporations that refused to promote their daughters to executive level jobs on the basis of gender. Gender disparities are not accepted in the secular context where each person’s unique ability to positively shape our world is concerned; why should they be embraced in the religious context when those are ultimately the stakes?

Or is participation in religious life really no more significant than whether one reads Sports Illustrated or Vogue?

Toronto
 

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Comments

"This argument by analogy fails to take into account that societal gender norms are not binding on any person — no girl is prohibited from wearing blue, and men have the freedom to see romantic comedies if they enjoy them."

No one's going to jail if they dress their little girl in blue, but no one's going to jail if they have women wear tefillin. But their are other consequences to dressing girls in blue and bucking other societal norms, whether regarding gender roles or in other areas of behavior. The Jewish religion has different norms for men and women and so does society generally, and you're free to do whatever you want. Clearly, there are results of violating God's law, just as (not to compare the two) there are embarrassing moments created when one tricks strangers into thinking you have a son instead of a daughter.

"Worse, this comparison to the secular world completely ignores the

workplace and academy, where egalitarianism is expected (even if not always realized). It’s hard to imagine that Rabbis Strauchler and Strulowitz would send their daughters to schools that refused to teach girls math or science. Or defend corporations that refused to promote their daughters to executive level jobs on the basis of gender. "

That's just confusing discrimination with different roles, which (I would have thought) anyone can discern the difference.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.