One-Week Workshops
view counter
Sharansky Urges Equal Prayer At Wall
Historic plan seen as victory for pluralism; ‘one Western Wall for one Jewish people.’
Tue, 04/09/2013 - 20:00
Editor And Publisher
Gary Rosenblatt
Gary Rosenblatt

Charged by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to come up with a Solomonic solution to the growing controversy over women’s prayer at Judaism’s holiest site, Natan Sharansky, the chair of the Jewish Agency for Israel, is prepared to recommend a bold plan to allow any and all Jews to pray at Jerusalem’s Western Wall.

After extensive private consultations and meetings here this week with high-level communal and religious leaders from the major streams, Sharansky told The Jewish Week in an exclusive interview that the talks “gave me great encouragement to go forward.”

Upon his return to Israel, Sharansky will present his formal recommendation to Netanyahu; the proposal would then require approval and government funding. The plan likely will face opposition from some Orthodox groups who until now have had exclusive authority over prayer at the Wall, but Sharansky expressed hope it will prevail.

He has conducted dozens of private meetings here and in Israel since being appointed by Netanyahu last December to be, in effect, a one-man commission. His task: to resolve the thorny issue of prayer at the Wall, balancing human and religious rights in a political context.

The key to his plan, he explained, is “too see all of the Western Wall as one.” The proposal calls for renovating the southwest portion of the Wall, which had been the site of archaeological excavations since soon after the 1967 Six-Day War, and elevate it to equal prominence to the existing area where prayers are now held. (Sharansky pointed out that while the area was set aside for excavation there has been no activity at the site of late.)

That area, known as Robinson’s Arch, has been used for egalitarian prayer in recent years but is quite small. Its holiness as part of the Western Wall is not disputed, but currently access for prayer there is only available on a limited basis and subject to an entrance fee.

The renovation would, in effect, double the area of the Wall dedicated to prayer; one half, now the site of religious services, would remain as is, and continue to be used for traditional prayer. The other half, continuing south (or, facing the Wall, to the right), would be the same length and set aside for egalitarian prayer.

“One Western Wall for one Jewish people” with equal access to all, asserted Sharansky.

Leading up to his New York visit there had been concern that Reform leaders here, sensitive to the concerns of Anat Hoffman, director of Reform’s Israel Religious Action Center and head of Women of the Wall, the group that has sought full equality for praying at the Wall each month on Rosh Chodesh, might balk at not gaining the right to pray in the traditional prayer area of the Kotel.

But Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, told The Jewish Week after meeting with Sharansky that while the plans “are not all we had hoped for, they represent a dramatic step towards a State of Israel that respects and protects the rights of non-Orthodox Jews.”

He noted that many details need to be worked out, “but in general I am hopeful that we are moving towards a solution that would affirm the unity of the Jewish people and the many authentic ways to practice Judaism.”

Rabbi Steven Wernick, CEO of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, said after meeting with Sharansky that “the proposed concept is significant, and there was good will about continuing to talk about refining it.” He said he and his colleagues look forward to working with Sharansky “to find a solution that is good for the entire Jewish people.”

Modern Orthodox officials are said to have offered tacit approval.

The fact that Netanyahu himself acted on this issue and appointed Sharansky, a widely respected hero for his years as an imprisoned Soviet Jewish refusenik, as his point man, indicates the importance given to the views of American Jews, most of whom are religiously liberal. There has been concern in Israel that increasing numbers of American Jews are feeling distant from the Jewish state, not only in terms of its inability to resolve the Palestinian conflict, but seeing themselves as second-class Jews, beholden to Orthodox control of marriage, divorce, conversion and prayer at the Wall. 

Sharansky emphasized that his plan “could seriously reduce tensions” and highlight “the Kotel’s unique role of unity rather than disrupting and dividing” the Jewish people. He noted that the proposal calls for 24-hour-a-day access to the Wall, a common entrance between the two prayer areas and would mark “the first time, and in the most visible place, there would be a choice between traditional and egalitarian prayer.”

While he expressed confidence that the proposal will be accepted and become policy, prompting an expensive and extensive renovation of the southwestern area of the Wall — estimated to take up to two years and cost a minimum of  $25 million — he acknowledged that there may be stumbling blocks ahead.

They include the antiquities authority, which oversees the archaeological aspects of the area, and the chief rabbi of the Wall, Shmuel Rabinovitz, as well as a wide range of haredi religious and political leaders, who have insisted on the status quo and oppose giving legitimacy to non-Orthodox practices at the Wall. And there is the critical question of what happens in the interim, during construction.

Will the monthly Women of the Wall Rosh Chodesh services continue to be a source of contention, and will its members be arrested during the extended construction period at the site, which has been a flashpoint for religious-oriented protest for many years?

Sharansky is hopeful that once his recommendations are accepted, an interim agreement can be worked out among the various players based on good will and the understanding that a permanent solution is in the works. But the longer the process takes, the greater the chance for disruption.

It is difficult to assess the impact of the recent Israeli election on this issue. On the one hand, the absence of haredi parties in the Israeli government increases the chances for approval of the Sharansky plan. On the other hand, haredi leaders have freer reign to express their disapproval, and could stage large protests, perhaps hoping the new government will fall and they can come back to a share of power.

Dov Lipman, an American-born Orthodox rabbi and new member of Knesset from Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid party, was in New York this week. When told of the Sharansky proposal, he said he favored the concept of providing a place at the Kotel for everyone who wanted to pray there.

“I can pray where I want to pray and others can do the same,” he said, but noted that “extremists” in the Israeli Orthodox community “will fight this.”

Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Women of the Wall

Our Newsletters, Your Inbox


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.


has any one informed our God of these plans . its not what man wants. God is truly wonderful all you have to do is ask. only He can change what is written in stone.

Any compromise to allow these "wall" women to make a hillul Hashem at the holiest place the Jewish people can visit, is a victory by ignorance over wisdom.

They, the women, have been educated by a cult.
And those judges and politicians who would rule in their favor have also been educated by a cult.

The women's "pain" when they are not allowed to make a hillul Hashem, is nothing compared to the pain felt by Jews and Jewish women all around the world and the pain felt in Shomayim-in Heaven for the public ignorance these women represent.

These women have no derech eretz. It is high time they moved out of their childlike mind-set for the good of all Israel everywhere.

This first step makes sense-incremental but significant change was embraced by civil rights leaders in the past then the continued their work to enhance the change at hand. The three sections work and people will vote w their feet (once they are prepared for use). It is not just American Jews Israel should worry about-my Christian and Mormon lady friends also notice the discrimination when they journey to Israel or watch the news. It has to change for all interested in the long term future of Israel.

On general principles, I'm opposed to this compromise. Jews (and non-Jews who wish to pray in solidarity) should be made to feel welcome in all parts of the Western Wall.

However, this proposed settlement represents a giant leap for Judaism. Right now, the situation's analogous to the Four Seasons hotel chain being white-only, while blacks are relegated to Motel 6 and adding insult to injury, are forced to pay more for their accommodations. At least under the proposal blacks would be allowed to stay at the Ritz-Carlton.

But even if it's now "separate but equal," it's still wrong and this compromise must be regarded as being just an interim step towards true equality.

It's fitting that this issue comes up while we are celebrating the anniversary of numerous Civil Rights milestones in this country. In the USA we're beyond "separate but equal" issues. Obviously not so in Israel. Don't take the bone weing offered. It's demeaning.

why not insist that the Vatican allow a gay organization a section of the square, or that Saudi Arabia allow a women's equality group space in Mecca? Why can't the Conservative Jewish religion be happy with the mess it has made in America?

I agree with you .the conservative and reform movement destroyed Judaism in American ,now they are trying to destroy our holiest place the western wall, they know quite well that never in Jewish history did woman wear tefillin or a talis in public.