Has Jewish Infighting Finally Hit Bottom?

We need a full-time professional to get us to talk to one another.

Wed, 02/20/2013
Editor and Publisher
Gary Rosenblatt
Gary Rosenblatt

It strikes me as praiseworthy, and more than a little sad, that the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York has created a position called “director of Jewish intracommunal affairs.”

Basically, the new post suggests that the increasing nastiness and lack of respect we Jews have shown for our fellow Jews who don’t vote, pray or think as we do has resulted in such serious rifts among us that we need to hire a full-time professional to get us to talk to each other.

That’s the responsibility of Matthew Ackerman, who since last fall has been working on bringing disparate elements of our community together to talk about the issue that once united and now divides us: Israel.

In the next few weeks, the JCRC will launch “The Israel Talks,” a carefully planned series of community forums, starting with groups of about 10 to 15 people in White Plains, the Upper East Side and Great Neck, neighborhoods chosen for their diverse elements.

“We want to make the groups cohesive and have people speaking freely among themselves,” says Ackerman, who will facilitate the discussions.

In nearby Bergen County, N.J., two participants of the Berrie Fellows Leadership program, designed to educate and inspire potential lay leaders in Jewish life, have helped plan an evening of interdenominational dialogue to try to break down the barriers between Jews who pray differently, or not at all.

Ian Zimmerman, a member of the liberal Temple Beth Rishon in Wyckoff, says he and Lee Lasher, president of the Modern Orthodox Congregation Ahavath Torah in Englewood, likely would never have met and become friends if not for the Berrie program. They decided to launch a project that would have lay leaders “get together, share best practices” and work toward convincing rabbis of the different streams “to work together better.”

The two, each in business in their professional lives, have launched Unite4Unity, a grassroots effort to encourage all kinds of Jews to gather, interact, learn from each other and form friendships. Their first program, scheduled for the evening of March 12 at Ahavath Torah, will be a moderated discussion among three local rabbis — Orthodox, Conservative and Reform — on the potentials and limits of cooperation.

On the college campus front, where faculty members as well as student activists often deride Israel as illegitimate, one result is that many Jewish students avoid the topic of Arab-Israeli relations because it is so polarizing and they are confused.

In response, several weeks ago, some 250 students from 17 colleges in the Northeast took part in the first bView conference, formally known as Brandeis Visions for Israel in an Evolving World. (See Opinion piece by Brandeis student Ryan Yuffe on page 24.) A year in the planning, the student-driven initiative was given high marks by participants for creating a culture for civil discussion, focusing on ways to allow various views to be heard, and talking about personal connections to Israel.

Three isolated signs of progress in the area of tolerance may not constitute a trend, but there is a sense that relations among differing groups of Jews has deteriorated to the point that pro-active steps need to be taken to avoid permanent fissures.

“Jewish unity seems only to be reactionary,” noted Lee Lasher, “like after a synagogue is firebombed” or when Israel is under physical attack. And too often that cohesiveness is short-lived.

“We need to be more strategic,” he said.

Ian Zimmerman agrees, adding: “Except for our practice of Judaism, we Jews have much more in common than what separates us. The key is to get people to see that.”

At the JCRC in New York, Ackerman, who handled media relations for The David Project, which helps promote Israel on campuses, has been doing a lot of listening since he was hired last summer. He was trained through a program launched by the JCRC and federation in San Francisco, called “The Year of Civil Discourse,” begun several years ago after a series of controversies about Israel seriously threatened communal harmony in the Bay area.

The program helps participants learn to talk to each other more respectfully while disagreeing, with the goal not necessarily to change minds but to discuss issues with a level of trust and with the good of the community uppermost.

Ackerman has also worked closely with the University of Virginia social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, whose well-received book, “The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion,” argues that people depend more on intuition than logic in making decisions. He says that groups on the political left and right fail to appreciate the other side’s legitimate fears and concerns.

“Each side is usually right about what it asserts but wrong about what it denies,” says Ackerman, summarizing Haidt.

Together they are trying to apply these insights to foster more productive discussion about Israel from both hawks and doves.

The small forums will be held in people’s homes and food will be served, helping to personalize the experience. The sessions will be held every four to six weeks, and hopefully the participants will become the conveners, and the number of groups will increase and more communities will be involved.

“It’s about creating a positive dynamic,” says Ackerman.

With the national election results bringing a renewed sense of hope among many Israelis pleased to see fresh faces in the Knesset, and the growing realization here that an aging and shrinking Jewish community in this country cannot afford to be its own worst enemy, maybe, just maybe, the tide is turning from tearing each other down to hearing each other out.

Let’s hope it’s not too late.

Gary@jewishweek.org Follow Gary Rosenblatt’s blog, RosenBlog, at www.thejewishweek.com throughout the week.
 

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.

Comments

Too much money floating around; too few smart heads to use it effectively.

J Street are nothing but a bunch of trolls, they should be IGNORED and eventually they will go away!

It is great to read this report about successful efforts to foster constructive dialogue across challenging political and religious differences! The organization that I direct, the Jewish Dialogue Group, has published a free guidebook that readers can use to facilitate respectful, engaged dialogue in their own organizations and communities. "Constructive Conversations about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict" offers step-by-step instructions for organizing and leading structured conversations, as well as other materials for use in dialogue programs. It was created jointly with the Public Conversations Project, and it has been used in synagogues, schools, and other venues across North America. We welcome all who are interested to download it free of charge from our website: www.jewishdialogue.org.

Though it saddens me that it is the divide around multiple issues relating to Israeli politics, the conflict, religious hegemony, women, civil rights, minorities, migrant workers (need I go on?) that is driving this most welcome initiative, I am encouraged by it as well for a number of reasons. ‘Machloket’ and diversity is part of our historical and intellectual DNA and development, and is deeply rooted in our ethical foundations and spirituality (Yisrael). It comes from a desire to improve upon, to navigate and to take ownership and responsibility. “70 Panim” (70 faces) is a wonderful metaphor for our engagement with Judaism and for our relationship with Israel, and implicit in this notion is the respect we must have for one another, even though we may hold very deep and long lasting disagreements. Safe spaces for dialogue and meaningful discussions are essential tools that promote respect and encourage members of our community, whether on the periphery or at the center, to remain engaged, be listened to, and to empower into action. Too many times, as a Jewish and Israel educator, I have witnessed, not only students, but my colleagues as well, fellow educators, walk away out of frustration, despair and ambivalence, from opportunities to engage in Israel education. I therefore encourage this initiative to invite all those educators who work with young people, so that they are provided with frameworks for support, empowerment and for sharing their experiences in the classroom, with parents and with fellow teachers (including authentic dialogue between Israeli and non Israeli, Jewish and non Jewish teachers ) and other communal educators.

I have witnessed first hand, through the work of the Year of Civil Discourse’s visionary founding facilitator, Rachel Eryn Kalish, and her colleagues at the San Francisco’s JCRC, the deep and invigorating impact this process and experience has had amongst school educators who have a deep commitment to Israel, but struggle daily when educating our younger generation as they wade through the myriad of Israel’s complexities, its beauties, its assets, its relevance and centrality to our Jewish lives and identity, but also on the flip side of this same coin, its challenges and ethical dilemmas.

By creating communities for civil discourse, we are celebrating the diverse narratives and experiences of why we are Jewish and our individual and collective relationship and responsibility towards Israel. For me it gives depth to the meaning of the ‘hood’ part of ‘Peoplehood’ , and ‘Arevut Hadadit’ (Mutual responsibility). Yishar Koach!

Thank you so much for publicizing this important, ground-breaking initiative. You expressed very clearly and compellingly why this work is so needed. I only wish that the headline had led with how truly good it is that people are making sophisticated efforts to address the problem, rather than re-enforcing a kind of negativity bias. Actually, this is indeed a trend in the American Jewish community, as many professionals have been working with multiple communities to heal our public polarized discourse. Thank you for spreading the good news. May it continue!

Why not contribute to community with the title "Jewish community values cohesion: Hires full-time consultant"? Maybe our journalists could use some of that consultant's time to learn to feature "repair" rather than "conflict"?

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.