'Meathead' makes Holocaust comparison, and why we need a serious study of this rhetoric
10/25/2010 - 22:08
James Besser

Why do they do it?

Now the Anti-Defamation League is going after film actor and producer Rob "Meathead" Reiner,  who likened the Tea Party movement – which has been wrist-slapped for it's own numerous Holocaust comparisons - to the Nazis.

Appearing on HBO's Real Time, Reiner, the onetime All in the Family star,  said “My fear is that the Tea Party gets a charismatic leader. Because all they’re selling is fear and anger. And that’s all Hitler sold.”

The ADL has warned of extremism within the anarchic Tea Party movement, but that's no reason to bring Hitler into the picture when criticizing them, said national director Abe Foxman.

“There is simply no comparison between followers of the Nazis, a fascist regime that perpetrated the slaughter of millions of Jews and others in the Holocaust, and followers of a democratic political movement in the United States,” Foxman said. “Such comparisons only serve to trivialize the Holocaust and are deeply offensive to Jews and other survivors, as well as those Americans who fought valiantly against the Nazis in World War II.”

But it sure looks like Foxman is fighting a losing battle.

Right, left and center, politicians can't seem to resist the allure of Holocaust comparisons. No election is too trivial, no issue too local, to invoke images of storm troopers and gas chambers. Don't like your candidate for alderman? Say he's a propagandist like Goebbels. Don't like your county commissioner? Say his campaign reminds you of Hitler's early days.

What I don't get: when I hear a Nazi comparison, I immediately tune out the person making it – Democrat, Republican, Tea Partier whatever – because I assume this is not a serious person, or not smart enough to know that being politically wrong isn't the same as advocating the most murderous regime in human history.

But I also know that politicians are pragmatists; they generally don't keep doing stuff that doesn't work. So on some level, there must be evidence using Nazi ideologies works; why else would so many candidates risk provoking the ADL?

So here's what I propose: a serious study by some serious political scientists. Does using Nazi and Holocaust analogies make politicians more credible to voters – or less credible? Do other parts of their message get absorbed by others better when punched up with Holocaust talk or not?

Maybe we can get the ADL to fund the study to help find out why politicians don't seem to heed calls to stop using allusions that, as Abe Foxman said, “demean the American political system” and “trivialize the Holocaust .”

view counter

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.


There is nothing apt in it. All populist movements are not proto-Nazis. People calling for smaller government, less interference in our lives, and a return to the Constitution are the antithesis of the National Germany Socialist Workers Party. Are there racist members of the Tea Party? You bet. Of course this is nothing compared to the ethnic lobbies running the Democrat party these days. Is the lack of coordination and anarchic nature allowing those with opposing beliefs to worm their way in? You bet. (Notice how La Roucheites bring thier posters etc and union thugs try to break up events manufacture extremism) I hate when people misuse the term Nazi. But its been a staple of the left since they smeared the half-Jewish libertarian Barry Goldwater in 1964.
While a lot of the talk from the more extreme parts of the tea partiers sounds EXACTLY like the arguments that eventually led to the national socialist movement, this can be said about almost any political movement and calling them "Nazis" is just a scarecrow argument ("Strawman punching bag"). There are people from very different areas of the political map in a supposed "party". It's when/if their candidates start talking about physically getting rid of people that they disagree with and look strong/even in a presidential poll, that it is no longer just name-calling. A great example of the comparisons people make is at the AlterNet site but Google finds about a trillion more examples. ;)
Time for Foxman to retire. Did he watch it? It was an apt comparison. He didn't call the tea party people Nazis. He explained what happened in that era and how an angry right winger that made Jews the "other" came to power when people where Angry and hurting in economic depression of that era. Foxman ought to be ashamed of himself. He has been pandering of late to ther right wing with his anti-mosque rhetoric anyway. He is making the good work of the ADL a joke.