J Street announces fundraising totals, 2010 recipients
07/02/2010 - 13:28
James Besser

J Street announced yesterday that its political action committee has raised $650,000 so far this year and that it's doling out dough for some 61 candidates, including 10 Jewish incumbents.

That puts the dovish pro-Israel group ahead of its fundraising totals for 2008, the last major election year; J Street officials say they're on track to raise over $1 million by the end of 2010.

Included on its list of recipients are some familiar Jewish names, including Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Il.) - all strong pro-Israel voices who don't seem scared off by J Street's reputation as the group major pro-Israel leaders love to hate.

Not so Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.),  a former J Street ally  who turned down J Street money this year.

J Street is also giving to Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.), a three-term incumbent who, polls show, could be in real trouble in a state where tea party sentiment is running high.And it has given more than $75,000 to Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.), who beat Sen. Arlen Specter in the recent Democratic primary. Sestak's race against former Rep. Pat Toomey, a Republican who is expected to win a lot of pro-Israel money, is shaping up as a critical test of J Street's clout.

Does $650,000 make J Street a  major player in pro-Israel funding? Well, it's not chump change, but it pales in comparison to the millions donated by the pro-Israel PACs across the country, bundlers and individual givers who are influenced by AIPAC and other top pro-Israel groups.

Still, many observers say J Street is doing well for a two-year-old group that is challenging pro-Israel orthodoxy in American politics and that it's fundraising totals are a start in the group's effort to provide cover for politicians who support Israel but don't always support the positions of AIPAC and other major Jewish groups..

Ackerman's decision to take J Street money is particularly significant. Could the endorsement hurt him in his New York district?

Kean University political scientist Gilbert Kahn said probably not.

“Rep. Ackerman can never have his allegiances to Israel questioned,” Kahn said. “He and other members have accepted pro-Israel money before from individuals and PACs that are more right-wing than many in the general pro-Israel community. This decision by Rep. Ackerman will not alter his very key role; in fact, it may enhance it.”

view counter

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.


Why do you call J-street a "Pro Israel Group"? J-street is another far left group that being influenced by the Saudi money in order to push Israel back to the Auschwitz borders in the name of "Peace and Security". A "Jewish" group that initiate it's her own policy to be imposed on Israel is a very dangerous group. All other Pro-Israel groups operate in a wide range of political atmosphere that doesn't oppose any Israel nor American political stands. J-street tries to play differently by breaking this rule and so inflicting more instability on US-Israel relations and by that creating a more tuff political situation in the Israel-Arab conflict.
The representatives should not accept this money. JStreet can send it directly to Hamas.
It doesn't seem to me that major pro-Israel leaders hate J Street per se; it seems like major established pro-Israel organizations, like AIPAC and the Conference, are sick of J Street saying they're bad for Israel and American Jews, intolerant of the far Left, partners in crime with the Netanyahu government, things like that. I've also read about J Street leaders who view AIPAC as the opposition but other leaders who've said that the groups share membership in the larger U.S. pro-Israel community. How things play out will probably reflect the partisan conflict in this country, as J Street did extremely well in 2008 when the Democrats won landslide victories across the board, and how the candidates they back will perform in more GOP-friendly environs remains to be seen. It should be interesting.