'Joe The Plumber' In Hot Water Over Holocaust Reference
06/21/2012 - 16:48
Stewart Ain

Samuel Wurzelbacher, who gained fame in 2008 as “Joe the Plumber” who posed a question to Barack Obama -- and is now running for Congress in Ohio --  is garnering unwanted attention for suggesting that Nazi gun control laws contributed to the Holocaust.

“In 1939, Germany established gun control,” a narrator says in a campaign video posted Monday for Wurzelbacher, who is seen shooting fruit and vegetables with a shotgun. “From 1939 to 1945, 6 million Jews and 7 million others, unable to defend themselves, were exterminated.”

Wurzelbacher, a Republican, immediately came under attack from the National Jewish Democratic Council. David Harris, its president and CEO, said in a statement: “It is not acceptable ever to invoke the Holocaust to make a political point. To say it does a disservice to those who perished and the memory of the Holocaust is putting it mildly.”

In the video, the narrator said also that in 1911 Turkey established gun control and that from 1915 to 1917 “1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were exterminated.” The video ends with Wurzelbacher turning to the camera and saying, “I love America.”

Harris demanded that Wurzelbacher take down the video from You Tube which is titled “I Love America -- Joe on the 2nd Amendment.” By Thursday afternoon, it had been viewed more than 36,500 times.

Ohio Democratic Chairman Chris Redfern was quoted as labeling the video “incredibly offensive.”

But Wurzelbacher not only refused to take down the video but also actually defended it.

“No one in the video said gun control CAUSED genocide,” he Tweeted. “Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that his agenda would not be possible unless the people were disarmed.”

And he told ABC News that he was simply stating historical fact.

“I'm not saying gun control was causing the Holocaust in any shape or form and the people who are saying that are motivated by petty partisan politics," he said. “I believe ultimately the left -- they hate history.”

By Wednesday, he was telling the Toledo Blade that he “wasn't talking about the Holocaust” in the video and blamed the media for distorting everything.

“All I said was gun control was implemented, and then governments proceeded to violate human rights. Nowhere did I mention the Holocaust or was I even talking about it.”

Wurzelbacher gained fame in 2008 when then Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain of Arizona cited him as someone whose tax bill for his plumbing business would increase under Barack Obama’s tax proposal.

His campaign spokesman, Phil Christofanelli, was quoted by the paper as saying: “The argument is that gun control created the environment in which it was considerably easier for Nazis and other tyrannical governments to engage in human rights abuses. So I believe the point of the video was to highlight a number of human rights abuses that were facilitated by gun control. Joe did not say the Holocaust was caused by gun control."

“I think it's a big difference to say gun control caused the Holocaust, which is not our position,” he added. “His position is policies like gun control are implemented by tyrannical governments.”

The Toledo Blade said Steve Fought, campaign manager and spokesman for Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D., Toledo), Wurzelbacher's Democratic opponent, suggested Wurzelbacher “go back and watch his own stupid video. He sounds like he is a stranger to personal responsibility, but he very clearly talked about what he called genocide in Armenia and the Holocaust.” 


view counter

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.


The simple fact is that had there been 9 million guns, one for each of the 9 million Jews who resided in Europe (not Germany) prior to the Holocaust, things would have turned out a whole lot different. I honestly do not know how anyone can argue against this point -- it is one thing to kick down doors and drag helpless people to their death -- it is something else entirely when they can shoot back.

Remember too that much of the Holocaust occurred while the full resources of the German military were needed to fight a war. Had the Warsaw Ghetto been better armed, had there been more uprisings, the Nazis would have had to put the Holocaust on hold due to military necessity. They would not have been able to crush multiple well-armed uprisings while also fighting the war -- or if they had tried, the war would have been over a whole lot faster.

But the Nazis were bullies and bullies are inherent cowards. Bullies attack those who can't defend themselves -- and 6 Million Jews wouldn't have died had they been armed. It is that simple....

I agree: large numbers of guns in private hands enable individuals to defy the laws and policies of their government. When the laws and policies of the government include genocidal mass-murder, it is certainly a good thing that people should be enabled to defy them. However, the laws and policies of our government in the US do NOT include genocide, but they DO include such thing as laws against murder, laws against theft, laws preventing dealing dangerous drugs, laws enforcing behavior on the roads, and much else.

I for one regard conformity to these laws as valuable, and think it highly undesirable that individuals are given increased power to defy them by being allowed free access to weapons. That everyday reality is played out every day in the streets of our cities. It is much more important to rein in that current and immediate danger by restricting the circulation of guns in private hands, than it is to give people guns to guard against the remote danger that the US government will turn to genocide at some point in the future.