Rabbi Ponet Speaks
If you aren’t completely sick of hearing about Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky’s co-officiated wedding, you may want to read Rabbi James Ponet’s piece for Tablet about his decision to officiate at intermarriages.
Now, if all you want are some choice tidbits about Chelsea and Marc (or Marc’s mom, who was featured in the New York Times magazine a few weeks ago), don’t bother. The rabbi, who never did return my phone call or e-mail (sigh), isn’t talking. However, his account of his Jewish journey — from Reform rabbinical school to Chabad shuls to Jerusalem’s Hartman Institute to presiding over what the New York Times has called “the most publicized interfaith wedding in recent American history” — is compelling.
Rabbi Ponet writes that he reversed course on intermarriages about five years ago when he:
began to acknowledge that my legal scruple about officiating or co-officiating at such a wedding was not consistent with my willingness to discount many other traditional norms. The halachah [Jewish law]’s non-recognition of a particular action had never restrained me from praying in an egalitarian minyan where a woman might serve as cantor, for example, or joining in a service at which instruments were played on Shabbat.
I do not fully understand all his reasoning, and I am not sure what I think of his call, later on, for “Judaism to formulate a thoughtful, traditionally connected ceremony through which a Jew may enter into a marriage with a non-Jew, a prescribed way or ways by which a rabbi may officiate or co-officiate at such a wedding.” Haven’t the hundreds (thousands?) of rabbis who already officiate at interfaith weddings already done exactly that and why, if one doesn’t feel bound by Jewish law anyway, does one need a “prescribed way” to go about this?
I also wish the piece shared more of his personal struggle vis a vis intermarriage. One of the comments posted in response to the article mentioned that Rabbi Ponet’s children are intermarried — if this is true, it seems kind of odd not to mention that, given that it must have shaped his outlook at least a little bit. On the other hand, I recognize that just because I like blabbing about my children all the time (and, to a point, reading other people’s blabbing about their personal lives) not everyone feels comfortable doing so.
Not surprisingly, most of the comments posted in response to his piece were unpleasant ones from the triumphalist anti-intermarriage school of Jews who apparently have nothing better to do a day before Rosh HaShanah than critique and condemn the rabbi. (Unlike yours truly, who is squeezing in this blog post in between some very industrious soul searching sessions, Rosh HaShanah menu planning and Jewish Week copy editing.)
Happy New Year to all! And don't forget to "like" me on Facebook!
Signup for our weekly email newsletter here. Check out the Jewish Week's Facebook page and become a fan! Follow the Jewish Week on Twitter: start here. |
The Latest from Jewish Week Bloggers
Recent Posts
-
02/02/12, 2:25 pm
-
02/01/12, 2:13 pm
-
01/27/12, 12:17 pm
-
01/18/12, 2:29 pm
-
01/09/12, 3:33 pm
In the Mix Archives
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (4)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (7)
- October 2011 (7)
- September 2011 (7)
- August 2011 (5)
- July 2011 (5)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (6)
- April 2011 (6)
- March 2011 (7)
About this Blog
More observations on living an intermarried life by "In the Mix" writer Julie Wiener.
Julie has been a journalist since 1997 and lives in Jackson Heights, Queens, with her “Righteous Gentile” husband and their two young daughters.


Comments
The Jewish Week welcomes comments on our stories and encourages discussions germane to our articles. But we will not become a platform for screaming matches or personal attacks against individuals, organizations or religious or political perspectives.
Commenting guidelines:
The answer is simple. Ponet was thrust into the spotlight and therefore seeks to act like our own new pope - to pontificate.
Julie Wiener never misses a chance to cast aspersions on those who do not support intermarriage. Contrary to her assumption, we are not all right wing or triumphalist. Many Jews who support full religious participation for women and are politically liberal still view intermarriage as intrinsically destructive to the Jewish people. She can joke or make snide comments about this position but the long term continuity of Jewish life is a complex and serious issue. In fact, her lack of support of for Rabbi Ponet is puzzling
given her own acceptance of intermarriage.
Post new comment