Haredi Orthodox Rabbis Ban Internet
04/04/2011 - 23:17
Rabbi Jason Miller
Internet is Forbidden for Ultra-Orthodox
Internet is Forbidden for Ultra-Orthodox

Late last year, Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) rabbis banned the popular blog Voz Iz Neias and even went so far as to try to have it taken down. Now, FailedMessiah.com reports that the Agudath Israel of America's Moetzet Gedolei HaTorah has issued a ban prohibiting its adherents from using the Internet without a filter. The groups also recommends installing third party software that sends a record of all the websites visited to a monitoring agency, which would then report that usage to a designated party.


This is the strongest ban of Internet use by Haredi rabbis in the U.S., however, Israeli rabbis banned Internet usage over a decade ago. Miriam Shaviv explained in the Forward: "Israeli rabbis first came out against Internet use in January 2000, when more than 30 Haredi leaders forbade Internet connections at home. Back then, the main concern was the easy availability of online pornography. The ban was not particularly controversial, as Israeli Haredim had long accepted a similar ban on owning television sets. Many Haredim, however, circumvented the ban by using 3G phones, which allowed Internet access — until the rabbis forced them to buy 'kosher-certified' sets in which the Internet feature was disabled. Others frequented Internet cafés. Still others brought computers into the home for work purposes, a practice that the Rabbinical Commission for Media Affairs — established by leading Haredi rabbis to set policy — was forced to permit in 2007, conceding that the Internet was essential for many businesses."

The latest ban on the Haredi community in the U.S. reads as follows:

We are all aware of the grave danger internet has brought to the kedusha (sanctity) of the Jewish home and the Jewish family. Internet has made the worst kind of media, offensive images and other issurim chamurim (serious transgressions of Torah prohibitions) readily available to both children and adults.

Internet usage should by all means be avoided in homes and, wherever possible, also in business offices. In any event, chidlren should not be given Internet access. (In circumstances where children are compelled to use the Internet, this should be done only under the strictest parental supervision.)

Shaviv, foreign editor of Britain’s Jewish Chronicle, concluded her Forward op-ed arguing that "Haredim are going to stay online. The community's leaders may be able to retain some measure of control, by allowing and cooperating with 'kosher' Web sites. Alternatively, they can continue to issue ultimatums their followers will not meet, condemning themselves to irrelevancy."

view counter

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.


There is a Halachic principle, Ein Gozreim Gezarra Ella Im Ken Rov Hatzibur Yachol Lamod Boh". Halachic deciders should not promulgate an edict if most of the population will not follow the edict. The reason for this principle is simple; the general population will start to lose respect for Bet Din.
Unfortunately, this is exactly what will happen with this internet ban.
Shaviv is absolutely right.
What the outside world doesn't get is that the Charedei world is not religious based or faith based, it is socially or culturally based. That breeds a society in which people adhere to law not because of their belief system but because of peer pressure, their standing in society and the fear of not conforming.
While many in the Charedei world will attack the internet and talk about how insular their world is with pride, they will be viewing the internet (Bchadrrei Chadorim) in private. Many are more afraid of man than they are of G-d.

This is not a "ban". It is exactly the same as the very strong warnings, not outright prohibitions, issued on TV viewing in the late 1950s.