Beinart Pleasantly Surprised He Hasn’t Been Marginalized
05/27/2010 - 10:36
Gary Rosenblatt

Peter Beinart, the former New Republic editor whose strong critique of the American Jewish establishment in a New York Review of Books essay continues to reverberate in the community, says he has been pleasantly surprised by the responses he has received from pro-Israel critics.

In a phone interview yesterday, he told me he’d been warned by friends to “barricade your doors,” but that he has received “very few hostile reactions” and no charges of being a self-hating Jew, as he’d feared.

He believes the “debate is changing rapidly” regarding the Mideast impasse, and worries that the notion of Israel as a bi-national state is becoming increasingly “mainstream.”

Beinart, 39 and a fellow at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C., was about to meet with 35 high school juniors visiting for the day as part of The Jewish Week’s Write On for Israel program.

He put the issue in context for me by noting that about one-third of the critical responses he has received from his article, “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment,” have come from the left, primarily because he espouses a Jewish state.

“I’m a liberal Zionist,” he said, and rather than being marginalized, he called for the establishment to say, “we have a problem” regarding the fact that younger Jews are distancing themselves from Israel.

“Younger Jews who are liberal and care about these things are accessing their Zionism by identifying with those struggling to end the occupation,” he said. “They could be the next Tom Friedmans.
Those are the people we really need,” and it would be wrong to dismiss them as outside of the pro-Israel community, he asserted.

As to why he chose to publish his essay in the New York Review of Books, seen as highly critical of Israel in some quarters, Beinart explained that the New York Times Magazine had commissioned the piece but he and the editors had “stylistic differences.” He said that he then started looking for a publication to run his lengthy essay quickly, and decided on the New York Review.

“I think it’s unfair to charge them with being anti-Israel,” he said. “That’s a lazy way of talking. Yes, they’re on the left. They publish a number of Israeli intellectuals.

“My definition of anti-Israel,” he added, “is someone who doesn’t believe Israel should exist as a Jewish state,” noting that ‘I’m not anti-American because I was upset at how Dick Cheney” operated as vice president.

When I suggested that Beinart’s description, in his essay, of younger Jews distancing themselves from Israel was part of a larger concern of this group growing less attached to Judaism in general, he said, “that’s a fair charge – assimilation obviously plays a role.

“My point, though, is that the message the American Jewish establishment is sending now -- `come and join us and don’t publicly criticize Israel’ – is not working. We need a different, more effective message because young people are troubled and you have to take them seriously or you’ll just leave them in the cold.”

Get The Jewish Week Newsletter

Comment Guidelines

The Jewish Week feels comments create a valuable conversation and wants to feature your thoughts on our website. To make everyone feel welcome, we won't publish comments that are profane, irrelevant, promotional or make personal attacks.


"responses he has received from pro-Israel critics" Are those his words, or yours? Because I'm sure he does not regard himself as being anti-Israel, nor does he believe that being pro-Israel means supporting the policies of its current government.
If young people are more concerned with fitting in with their liberal friends than in identifying with Israel, there really is no reason to take their opinions very seriously. They are ignorant of basic history, and confident in their ignorance that they know best. They want, at some level, to be proud of Israel, but they have no idea what it is that they should be proud of. They are the products of a failure in education. They offer no potential contribution to Israel. We have lost generations before, this may be another lost generation. But we must sgtand with our dream, our hope, our TIKVAH, and hope that as this generation grows up, they may see the light. If we change because of their ignorance, we are truly lost.
All the NYRB publishes about Israel weaves the Palestinian narrative of history. Having followed every bit of this blogfest, I suggest that Peter Beinart go back to American domestic politics for his subject, and try studying history. One huge problem is that younger American Jews think Israeli history started in 1980. Beinart's revulsion of Shas and Yisrael Beitenu being part of Netanyahu's coalition is IL-liberal intolerance. It is offensive that Beinart allows his personal prejudices to suggest that his solution to Israel's problem with young, liberal American Jews would require ethnic cleansing of 25% of Israeli Jewish citizens. It is uncomfortable to read responses to Beinart that seem to let his professional credentials cow others into apologists. I am secular, but older, and study history. I think Beinart should be ignored, and forced to relocate to the Bukharan Jewish neighborhood of Queens in order to overcome his prejudice and intolerance. The New York Times was smart to reject his original essay. May the equivalent of blogosphere time be spent discussing Ambassador Michael Oren's two commencement speeches, at Brandeis, and Yeshiva Universities. More history and rational thinking. Less self-important propagandists.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.